Learn to discern by exercise,

ii. 301, § 21.
Much quicker would not be

useful to us, ii. 16, § 12.
Our organs of sense suited to
our state, ibid. &c. § 12,
13.

Sensible knowledge is as certain

as we need, iii. 73, § 8.
Sensible knowledge goes not

beyond the present act, iii.
74, § 9.

Shame, i. 235, § 17.
Simple ideas, i. 99, § 1.

Not made by the mind, ibid.
§ 2.

Power of the mind over them,

i. 156, § 1.

The materials of all our know-
ledge, i. 116, § 10.
All positive, i. 117, § 1.
Very different from their
causes, i. 117, § 2, 3.
Sin, with different men, stands
for different actions, i. 50,
§ 19.

Solidity, i. 105, 106, § 1.
Inseparable from body, i. 106,
§ 1.

By it body fills space, ibid.
§ 2.

This idea got by touch, i. 105,
§ 1.

How distinguished from space,
i. 107, § 3.

How from hardness, i. 108, § 4.
Something from eternity demon-
strated, iii. 56, § 3: iii. 59,
§ 8.

Sorrow, i. 233, § 8.
Soul thinks not always, i. 86,
§ 9, &c.

Not in sound sleep, i. 88, § 11,
&c.

Its immateriality, we know
not, ii. 331. 358, § 6:
ii. 345, &c.

Religion, not concerned in the
soul's immateriality, ii. 359,
360, § 6.

Our ignorance about it, ii. 70,
§ 27.

The immortality of it, not
proved by reason, ii. 346,
&c.

It is brought to light by re-
velation, ibid.

Sound, its modes, i. 225, § 3.
Space, its idea got by sight and

touch, i. 158, § 2.

Its modifications, i. 158, § 4.
Not body, i. 163, 164, § 11,
12.

Its parts inseparable, i. 164,
§ 13.

Immoveable, i. 164, 165, § 14.
Whether body, or spirit, i. 165,
§ 16.

Whether substance, or ac-
cident, i. 165, § 17.
Infinite, i. 168, § 21: i. 210,
§ 4.

Ideas of space and body di-
stinct, i. 170, 171, § 24,
25.
Considered as a solid, i. 200,
201, § 11.

Hard to conceive any real

being void of space, i. 201.
Species; why changing one
simple idea of the complex
one is thought to change
the species in modes, but
not in substances, ii. 280,
§ 19.
Of animals and vegetables,
mostly distinguished by
figure, ii. 228, § 29.
Of other things, by colour,
ibid.

Made by the understanding,
for communication, ii. 201,
§ 9.

No species of mixed modes
without a name, ii. 203,
§ 11.
Of substances, are determined
by the nominal essence, ii.
212. 215. 218, &c. § 7, 8.
11. 13.

t

Not by substantial forms, ii.

215, § 10.

Nor by the real essence, ii.
219, § 18: ii. 223, § 25.
Of spirits, how distinguished,
ii. 215, § 11.

More species of creatures
above than below us, ii.
216, § 12.

Of creatures very gradual, ib.
What is necessary to the
making of species, by real
essences, ii. 218, § 14, &c.
Of animals and plants, cannot
be distinguished by propaga-
tion, ii. 222, § 23.
Of animals and vegetables,
distinguished principally by
the shape and figure; of
other things, by the colour,
ii. 228, § 29.

Of man, likewise, in part, ii.
224, § 26.

Instance, abbot of St. Martin,
ii. 225.

Is but a partial conception of
what is in the individuals,
ii. 231, § 32.

It is the complex idea, which
the name stands for, that
makes the species, ii. 234,
§ 35.
Man makes the species, or

sorts, ii. 235, § 36, 37.
The foundation of it is in the
similitude found in things,
ibid. § 36, 37.
Every distinct, abstract idea
makes a different species,
ibid. § 38.
Speech, its end, ii. 158, § 1, 2.
Proper speech, ii. 165, § 8.
Intelligible, ibid.

Spirits, the existence of spirits
not knowable, iii. 76, § 12.
How it is proved, ibid.
Operation of spirits on bodies,

not conceivable, ii. 379, §28.
What knowledge they have, of
bodies, ii. 302, § 23.

Separate, how their knowledge

may exceed ours, i. 141, § 9.
We have as clear a notion of
the substance of spirit as of
body, ii. 11, § 5.

A conjecture, concerning one
way of knowledge wherein
spirits excel us, ii. 18, § 13.
Our ideas of spirit, ii. 20, § 15.
As clear as that of body, ibid. :
ii. 23, § 22.
Primary ideas belonging to
spirits, ii. 21, § 18.

Move, ii. 21, 22, § 19, 20.
Ideas of spirit and body com-
pared, ii. 23, § 22: ii. 29,
§ 30.

The existence of spirits, as
easy to be admitted, as that
of bodies, ii. 27, § 28.
We have no idea, how spirits
communicate their thoughts,
ii. 32, § 36.

How far we are ignorant of
the being, species, and pro-
perties of spirits, ii. 378,
§ 27.

The word, spirit, does not ne-
cessarily denote imma-
teriality, ii. 332.
The scripture speaks of ma-
terial spirits, ii. 333.
Stupidity, i. 141, § 8.
Substance, ii. 1, § 1.
No idea of it, i. 72, § 18.
Not very knowable, ibid.
Our certainty, concerning sub-
stances, reaches but a little
way, ii. 390, 391, § 11, 12:
iii. 20, § 15.

The confused idea of substance
in general, makes always a
part of the essence of the
species of substances, ii.
220, § 21.

In substances, we must rectify
the signification of their
names, by the things, more
than by definitions, ii. 303,
§ 24.

Trifling propositions, iii. 43.
Discourses, iii. 50-52, § 9,
10, 11.
Truth, what, iii. 1, § 2: iii. 3,
§ 5 iii. 6, § 9.

Of thought, iii. 1, § 3: iii. 6,
§ 9.

Of words, iii. 1, § 3.
Verbal and real, iii. 5, 6, § 8,
9.

Moral, iii. 7, § 11.
Metaphysical, ii. 136, § 2:
iii. 7, § 11.
General, seldom apprehended,
but in words, iii. 8, § 2.
In what it consists, iii. 3, § 5.
Love of it necessary, iii. 147,
§ 1.

How we may know we love it,
iii. 147, § 1.

V.

Vacuum possible, i. 169, § 22.
Motion proves a vacuum,
i. 179, § 23.

We have an idea of it, i. 107,

§ 3: i. 109, § 5.

Variety in men's pursuits, ac-
counted for, i. 272, 273,
§ 54, &c.
Virtue, what, in reality, i. 49,
§ 18.

What in its common applica-

tion, i. 42, § 10, 11.
Is preferable, under a bare
possibility of a future state,
i. 286, 287, § 70.

How taken, i. 49, § 17, 18.
Vice lies in wrong measures of
good, iii. 172, § 16.
Understanding, what, i. 239,
§ 5, 6.

Like a dark room, i. 152, § 17.
When rightly used, i. 3, 4, § 5.
Three sorts of perception in the

understanding, i. 239, § 5.
Wholly passive in the reception
of simple ideas, i. 98, § 25.

VOL. III.

Uneasiness alone determines the
will to a new action, i. 252,
&c. § 29. 31. 33, &c.
Why it determines the will,
i. 257, 258, § 36, 37.
Causes of it, i. 275, § 57, &c.
Unity, an idea, both of sensation
and reflection, i. 115, § 7.
Suggested by every thing, i.
202, 203, § 1.
Universality, is only in signs,
ii. 172, § 11.

Universals, how made, i. 148, § 9.
Volition, what, i. 239, §5: i. 244,
§ 15: i. 252, § 28.
Better known by reflection,

than words, i. 253, § 30.
Voluntary, what, i. 239, § 5:
i. 242, § 11: i. 251, § 27.

W.

What is, is, is not universally
assented to, i. 14, § 4.
Where and when, i. 197, § 8.
Whole bigger than its parts, its
use, iii. 30, § 11.

And part not innate ideas, i.
59, § 6.

Will, what, i. 239, § 5, 6: i.
244, 245, § 16: i. 252,
§ 29.

What determines the will, ib.
§ 29.

Often confounded with desire,
i. 253, § 30.

Is conversant only about our
own actions, i. 253, 254,
§ 30.
Terminates in them, i. 261,
§ 40.

Is determined by the greatest,
present, removeable uneasi-
ness, ib.

Wit and judgment, wherein dif-
ferent, i. 144, § 2.
Words, an ill use of words, one
great hinderance of know-
ledge, ii. 381, § 30.

CC

This abuse of words is a cause

of obstinacy in error, ii. 278,
§ 16.
Making them stand for real

essences, which we know
not, is an abuse of words,
ii. 278, 279, § 17, 18.
The supposition of their cer-
tain, evident signification,
an abuse of words, ii. 282,
§ 22.

Use of words is, 1. To com-
municate ideas. 2. With
quickness. 3. To convey
knowledge, ii. 284, § 23,
24.

How they fail in all these, ii.

known, in simple ideas, by
showing, ii. 297, § 14.

In mixed modes, by defining,
ibid. § 15.

In substances, by showing and
defining too, ii. 300, § 19:
ii. 301, 302, § 21, 22.
The ill consequence of learning
words first, and their mean-
ing afterwards, ii. 303, § 24.
No shame to ask men the
meaning of their words,
where they are doubtful,
ii. 304, § 25.

Are to be used constantly in

the same sense, ii. 306, § 26.
Or else to be explained, where
the context determines it
not, ii. 306, § 27.

How made general, ii. 158,
§ 3.
Signifying insensible things,
derived from names of sen-
sible ideas, ii. 159, § 5.
Have no natural signification,
ii. 161, § 1.

But by imposition, ii. 165, § 8.
Stand immediately for the ideas

of the speaker, ii. 161-163,
§ 1, 2, 3.

Yet with a double reference.
1. To the ideas, in the hearer's
mind, ii. 163, § 4.

2. To the reality of things,
ii. 164, § 5.

Apt, by custom, to excite ideas,
ii. 164, § 6.

Often used without significa-
tion, ibid. § 7.
Most general, ii. 166, § 1.
Why some words of one lan-
guage cannot be translated
into those of another, ii.
200, § 8.

Why I have been so large on
words, ii. 206, § 16.
New words, or in new significa-
tions, are cautiously to be
used, ii. 244, § 51.

Civil use of words, ii. 251, § 3.