...Sebright does not intend to exclude the union of animals nearly allied, for he justly remarks — " Mr. Bakewell had certainly the merit of destroying...superior merit, that we might have had the good fortune to possess." And he continues, that brother and sister may even be joined with certain views, " should...

...between parents and progeny, &c. It was, however, an absurd prejudice, as Sir John Sebright observes, " which formerly prevailed against breeding from animals,...any degree of relationship. Had this opinion been uni. versally acted upon, no one could have been said to possess a particular breed, good or bad ;...

...but the perfections of the one promise to correct in the produce, the imperfections of the other, 1 do not think it objectionable; much further than this...superior merit, that we might have had the good fortune to possess. The authorities of Mr. Bakewell, and of Mr. Meynel being generally quoted, when this subject...

...promise to correct in the produce the imperfections of the other, I do not think it objectionable. " Mr. Bakewell had certainly the merit of destroying...would have been dissimilar to that of another, and wo should have availed ourselves but little of an animal of superior merit, that we might have had...

...correct in the produce the imperfections of the other, I do not think it objectionable. " Mr. Bake well had certainly the merit of destroying the absurd prejudice...would have been dissimilar to that of another, and wo should have availed ourselves but little of an animal of superior merit, that we might have had...

...good, and particularly, should the same defects not predominate in both, but the perfections of the"bne promise to correct in the produce, the imperfections...superior merit, that we might have had the good fortune to possess. The authorities of Sir. Bakewell, and of Mr. Meynel being generally quoted, when this subject...