« السابقةمتابعة »
dwell, rejoicing in its beauty, but "caring not about its foundation any further than to know that it has one." This is a just comparison so far as it expresses the fundamental character of the miracles. But it betrays the defect of the common representation of these remarkable facts. Why should the occupants of the building care to know any more of that part of it which is hidden, buried in the earth, than its bare existence? At the point of view at which I have considered the miracles, and which it seems to me, every just principle of thought indicates, while they are no less essential than the above illustration represents, they become the key-stones of the great arches and domes of the edifice, arresting every eye, visibly imparting strength and perfection to the whole, blazing with celestial characters, and hewn as out of that sapphire which, in the vision of the prophet, was the throne of God.
I am aware that the exposition I have attempted of the true mode of regarding the Christian miracles (Chapters VIII., IX.) is very imperfect. Still it is best it should be published. If erroneous, its fallacy may be shown. If true, it will attract the attention
and engage the services of abler minds. In the meanwhile I avow myself a sincere believer in the reality of these wonderful facts. I believe that the blind received sight, the lame walked, the dead rose, and the winds and waves were hushed at the word of Jesus of Nazareth. I do not deny that these events attest his divine authority. But I know not how they can have any force as evidences of the divinity of his mission, until they are felt to have been wrought for a diviner end than merely to convince the understanding, even for a certain intrinsic worth which must be discerned, whether it be definable or not. God's means are always ends, and hence their efficiency as means. A good act, performed for example's sake, is not a good act, and consequently cannot have the influence of goodness. It must be done for its own sake, and then it will be powerful as an example. So I conceive it to be with the miracles of Jesus. They were wrought principally for their own sakes. They are demonstrations of the power of a single and pure purpose; and therefore are they powerful to convince. Thus do they testify that he was moved by the inspiration of God.
"Since I was of understanding"-to use the words of Sir Thomas Browne,-" to know we knew nothing," I have felt that there could hardly be a greater objection to a theory or mode of thought, than the pretension to explain everything. I am impressed with nothing more deeply, than with the vanity of supposing that the mind of man can so penetrate and compass any work of God as to be able to relieve it of all difficulty. I do not believe there are any questions, connected with the great subject of these pages, which are unanswerable; but there are many, I freely confess, that I cannot answer. There are many passages in the Gospels which I have not attempted to explain. I have not sought to remove difficulties, but to unveil the beaming features of truth; to point out some of those characteristics of these narratives which produce an impression of reality that no difficulties are strong enough to obliterate.
I have not wished to allude to the opinions of others, however erroneous, except as it became necessary to the unfolding of what seems to me to be
intrinsically true. I fear, however, I may have occasionally expressed myself, when there was no absolute need of it, in a manner that may wound the feelings of the serious and honest of other denominations. I regret every such expression, and wish that it were erased.