صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني

CHAPTER II.

OF THE THEME IN PERSUASION.

§ 215. THE Theme in persuasive discourse being ever a conception, it must always be apprehended under that form.

As the discourse will vary specifically in its form according as the motive or the action be made the germ of development, it becomes important that the speaker settle definitely in his own mind beforehand which shall preside over the arrangement and development, and govern himself by the decision in the whole conduct of the discourse.

§ 216. The question, whether the proposition should be stated, is to be determined by the same general principles which govern in the other species of dis

course.

The general rule is that it should be stated unless positive reasons be seen to exist against it. If the general theme of the discourse be supposed likely to give offense, the definite statement may be deferred to the end, or be gradually unfolded in the progress of the discourse, as the minds of the hearers may be prepared for it.

A variation from the usual method of proceeding in this case, may be justified sometimes, moreover, for the sake of variety, or on other similar grounds.

It is unnecessary to detail at any further length the diverse applications of these general principles according as the motive or the action itself is made the principle of development in the discourse.

1

CHAPTER III.

OF PERSUASIVE EXPLANATION, CONFIRMATION, AND EXCI

TATION.

§ 217. IN Persuasive Discourse, the various processes of explanation may be requisite either to set forth the proper theme of the discourse or the motives presented.

§ 218. In explanation applied to the motives, the application of the principles of explanation proper must be modified so far as may be necessary in order to exhibit them merely as grounds, or reasons, or inducements to action; that is, merely as motives.

motive will not

Only those as

Hence an object or truth presented as a necessarily be surveyed in its whole extent. pects will be taken of it which bear directly on the action proposed; and of these, while at the same time false impressions in regard to the state of the case are to be guarded against, only such should be presented as are favorable to the speaker's object. Great art and practiced judgment are often requisite here.

Exemplifications of these methods of modifying the principles of explanation proper are furnished in the orations of Demosthenes against Philip. The orator in them with great skill seizes hold of those particulars in the relations of the Athenians to the Macedonian power, and in the condition of Athens, which were fitted to inspire the Athenians with confidence in their own strength, and with contempt and resentment toward Philip, that he might thus incite them to a vigorous and efficient maintenance of hostilities. The ex

planations that are given, whether narrations of events or descriptions of places, of resources, etc., are all made from this one point of view, and are colored throughout by this one persuasive character. Nothing is said that does not bear directly on this single end; nothing is omitted that could promote it. The processes of explanation, it is however pertinent to observe here, are all very different from what would be proper in a purely explanatory discourse; very different, for example, from what are found in the histories of those times.

It should be remarked, in this connection, that it will frequently be necessary to construct the explanation in persuasive discourse in reference both to the motives and the action, as possibly the nature of the action may best be understood from a clear view of the motives.

§ 219. The explanation of the particular action urged in the discourse will conform more closely to the general principles of explanation; since, generally, it will be needful to unfold the nature of the action or course proposed more or less fully and distinctly.

§ 220. Confirmation enters into persuasive discourse whenever it is necessary to prove any allegation in reference to the theme, the practicability of the action proposed, or the connection between the motives and the action. Like explanation, in persuasive discourse, confirmation suffers important modifications.

It is not necessary to point out in particular detail the modifications which confirmation proper receives in persuasion. It is sufficient to remark generally that the whole work of confirmation here is regulated by a strict regard to the great object of the discourse, which is to move the will. Fine exemplifications of persuasive confirmation may be found in many of the political orations of Demosthenes, and the

speeches of Lord Chatham, Burke, Sheridan, and Patrick Henry.

§ 221. Excitation is necessary in persuasive discourse so far as the excitement of the feelings is relied upon for influencing the will. Like explanation and confirmation, however, it is modified in important features in respect to the particular end of persuasion. Only such feelings are to be awakened, and those to such degrees only, as are fitted to lead to the action desired.

It is important to be borne in mind in persuasive excitation, that the same object may awaken two or more different kinds of feelings, some of which may be favorable to the end proposed, and others adverse. Thus the increase of the Macedonian power, the multiplicity of its conquests and alliances, were fitted to excite the fear as well as the resentment of the Athenians. It was necessary, therefore, that the orator, whose design was to arouse the Athenians to a bold and vigorous prosecution of the war against Philip, should give only such a view of Philip's successes as would excite indignation and not desponding alarm. The orator is careful, accordingly, to attribute all these successes to fortune and to the supineness of the Athenians, artfully keeping back those causes of his prosperity which might awaken terror, and thereby dispose the Athenians to an inglorious peace.

« السابقةمتابعة »