...upon that occasion, touching the power of a State to prohibit the traffic in the most ample manner; " If any State deems the retail and internal traffic in ardent spirits injurious to its citizens, I see nothing in the constitution to prevent it from regulating and restraining the traffic, or from...

...constitution is at fault in this matter. "If any State," says the able Chief Justice of the United States, " deems the retail and internal traffic in ardent spirits injurious to its citizens, I see nothing in the constitution to prevent it from regulating and restraining the traffic, or prohibiting...

...importation, or diminish the profits of the importer, or lessen the revenue of the general government. And if any State deems the retail and internal traffic...from prohibiting it altogether, if it thinks proper.. Of 'the wisdom of this policy, it is'not my province or my purpose to speak. Upon that subject, each...

...and crime immediately increased in a remarkable degree. Judge Taney said, " If any state deems the internal traffic in ardent spirits injurious to its...citizens, and calculated to produce idleness, vice, and debauchery, I see nothing in the constitution to prevent it from regulating and restraining the...

...court, and by t- em decided. Chief Justice Taney, in his npiuion upon the case, says: "And if any staU deems the retail and internal traffic in ardent spirits injurious to its citizen*, and calculated to produce idleness, vice, or debauchery, I see nothing in th« constitution...

...words of Chief Justice Taney, who, in the Massachusetts case, so ably argued by Mr. Webster, said, " If any State deems the retail and internal traffic...citizens, and calculated to produce idleness, vice and debauchery, I see nothing in the Constitution of the United States to prevent it from regulating...

...according to its own judgment, and upon its own views of the interest and well-being of its citizens. I am not aware that these principles have ever been questioned....idleness, vice, or debauchery, I see nothing in the SECOND REASON OF REMONSTRANCE. 69 Constitution of the United States to prevent it from regulating and...

...Justice Taney, of the Supreme Court of the United States, in the great Massachusetts case, "decided, if any State deems the retail and internal traffic in ardent spirits injurious to its citizens, I see nothing in the constitution to prevent it from regulating and restraining the traffic, or from...

...ardent spirit) injurious to its citizens, and calculated to produce idleness, vice, or dcbauchery, I see nothing in the Constitution of the United States to prevent it from regulating or restraining the traffic, or from prohibiting it altogether, if it thinks proper." The other justices...

...according to its own judgment, and upon its own views of the interests and well-being of its citizens. I am not aware that these principles have ever been questioned....traffic, or from prohibiting it altogether, if it think? proper." Justice CATKON said : "If the State has the power to restrain by licenses to any extent,...