...of fuch Ufe to civil Society. 3. " That the Dottrine of a future State of Re" wards and Punijhments is not to be found in, nor " did make Part of the MOSAIC Difpenfation. Propofitions, our Author fays, fo clear and evident, that one might directly proceed...

...Ufe to Civil Society : He comes in the fecond Sedition to the /&/n/Propofition, THAT THEDOCTRINE OF A FUTURE STATE OF REWARDS AND PUNISHMENTS is NOT TO BE FOUND IN, NOR DID MAKE PART OF, THE MOSAIC DISPENSATION. In Support of the two firft Propofitions, Mr. Warburton had to do with the Atheift...

...Wellbeing of Civil Society. The Minor is ; cfbe Doftrine of a future State of Rewards and Punijbments is not to be found in, nor did make Part of the Mofaic Dijpenfation. The Conclufion follows of Courfe, viz. Therefore the Law of Mofes is of divine...

...:"»• • • :'..'•'*••.' , . — ; Jo -.THAT THE DOCTRINE OF <A FUTURE STATE OF fe£WARDS AND PUNISHMENTS IS NOT TO BE FOUND IN, NOR DID MAKE PART OF, THE MOSAIC DISPENSATION. ..' •''•.. .\ J.> Now as, in fuppoft of the two firft Propofitions, I was...

...of fuch uie to civil Society." 3. " That the dotbrine of a future Hate of re" wards and punifhments is not to be found in, ? nor did make part of, the Mofaic Difpenfation." —Neither a fhort nor an eafy talk. The twq firft requiring a feverc fearch...

...CONCURRED IN BELIEVING " AND TEACHING, THAT THIS DOCTRINE WAS " OF SUCH USE TO CIVIL SOCIETY. Í}. " THAT THE DOCTRINE OF A FUTURE STATE " OF REWARDS AND...NOT TO ** BE FOUND IN, NOR DID MAKE PART OF, ** THE MOSAIC DISPENSATION. ^ Propofitions fo clear and evident, that one would think, we might directly proceed...

...tie proof of tbe third ; namely, 3. THAT THE DOCTRINE Of A FUTURE STATE OF REWARDS AND PUNISHMFNTS, is NOT TO BE FOUND IN, NOR DID MAK.E PART OF, THE MOSAIC DISPENSATION. Hitherto we have been forced to move flowly, to feel for our way in the dark,...

...general propofition was to. be enforced, that " the doftrine of a future ftate of rewards and punifhments is not to be found in, nor did make part of the Mofaic difpenfation." But in proving the minor, a method fomewhat different from that obferved in proving...

...Gloucefter, ereas a dcmonftration of the divine lega'ion of Mofes upon this principle ^with two others) viz. "THAT THE DOCTRINE OF A FUTURE STATE OF REWARDS AND PUNISHMENTS IS NOT TO BE JOUND IN, Ko* DID MAKE A PART OF THE MoSAIO DISPENSATION." *-" The deiiionllration is To llrong and...

...Divine legation of Alqfes. He afiirms, The doctrine of a future ftate of renvards and pur.ifhments is not to be found in, nor did make part of the Mofaic difpenfation. It is certain, Jefus Chrift found the doctrine of a future ftate in what God in...