Indian Politics and Society since Independence: Events, Processes and IdeologyRoutledge, 12/05/2008 - 264 من الصفحات Focusing on politics and society in India, this book explores new areas enmeshed in the complex social, economic and political processes in the country. Linking the structural characteristics with the broader sociological context, the book emphasizes the strong influence of sociological issues on politics, such as social milieu shaping and the articulation of the political in day-to-day events. Political events are connected with the ever-changing social, economic and political processes in order to provide an analytical framework to explain ‘peculiarities’ of Indian politics. Bidyut Chakrabarty argues that three major ideological influences of colonialism, nationalism and democracy have provided the foundational values of Indian politics. Structured thematically and chronologically, this work is a useful resource for students of political science, sociology and South Asian studies. |
من داخل الكتاب
النتائج 1-5 من 57
... institutions of governance, but alsothevalues that inform these institutions. Wasthe change that Indiasaw following decolonization merely cosmetic then? There is also the argument that theinfluences of almost 200 years of colonialism ...
... Andits weltanschauung (worldview) is basedon'the mixedlegacies of colonial rule' that also upheld rule oflaw, bureaucracy, citizenship, parasitic landlords, modern political institutions and 'twotrack tradition' of protest.
Events, Processes and Ideology Bidyut Chakrabarty. parasitic landlords, modern political institutions and 'twotrack ... institutional step. 9 Although the colonial statewas hardly federal in its classical sense, the federal arrangement ...
... institutions, despite their clearcolonialroots, have undergonedramatic metamorphoses in independent India. A careful lookat the evolution of institutions in India clearlyshows thatthey evolved creatively toadjust to the changing ...
... institutions ofgovernance, very much partofBritish legacy, were alreadyinplace when the1947 transfer of power tookplace. The nationalist leaders,except M. A. Jinnah, deliberately avoided the nationalist language that could be ...
المحتوى
القسم 24 | |
القسم 25 | |
القسم 26 | |
القسم 27 | |
القسم 28 | |
القسم 29 | |
القسم 30 | |
القسم 31 | |
القسم 9 | |
القسم 10 | |
القسم 11 | |
القسم 12 | |
القسم 13 | |
القسم 14 | |
القسم 15 | |
القسم 16 | |
القسم 17 | |
القسم 18 | |
القسم 19 | |
القسم 20 | |
القسم 21 | |
القسم 22 | |
القسم 23 | |
القسم 32 | |
القسم 33 | |
القسم 34 | |
القسم 35 | |
القسم 36 | |
القسم 37 | |
القسم 38 | |
القسم 39 | |
القسم 40 | |
القسم 41 | |
القسم 42 | |
القسم 43 | |
القسم 44 | |
القسم 45 | |