Infeparable from body, 56. § 1. How diftinguished from space, ibid. § 3. Sorrow, 130. $8. Soul thinks not always, 46. § 9, &c. Its immateriality, we know not, 336. § 6. Religion, not concerned in the foul's imma- Our ignorance about it, 205. § 27. Sound, its modes, 125. § 3. Space, its idea got by fight and touch, 86. § 2. Whether body, or fpirit, ibid. § 16. Ideas of fpace and body diftinct, 94. §24, 25. Hard to conceive any real being void of space, Species; why changing one fimple idea of the Of animals and vegetables, mostly distinguish- · Of other things, by colour, ibid. Made by the understanding, for communica- No fpecies of mixed modes without a name, 272. II. Of fubftances, are determined by the nominal $13. Not by fubftantial forms, 272. 10. Of creatures very gradual, ibid. § 12. Of animals and plants, cannot be distinguish- Is but a partial conception of what is in the It is the complex idea, which the name ftands Every diftinct, abftract idea makes a different Speculation, matters of it not proved by votes, Speech, its end, 243. § 1, 2. Spirits, the exiftence of spirits not knowable, How it is proved, ibid. Operation of fpirits on bodies, not conceiv- What knowledge they have of bodies, 323. Separate, how their knowledge may exceed We have as clear a notion of the substance A conjecture, concerning one way of know- Primary ideas belonging to fpirits, 176. §18. Ideas of fpirit and body compared, 181. § 30. How far we are ignorant of the being, fpecies, Spirits: the fcripture fpeaks of material fpirits, ibid. Stupidity, 77. § 8. No idea of it, 37. § 18. Our certainty, concerning fubftances, reaches In fubftances, we must rectify the fignification Their ideas fingle, or collective, 85. § 6. Obfervables, in our ideas of fubftances, 183. $37. Collective ideas of substances, ibid, &c. The ideas of fubftances, have in the mind a not difcarded by the effay, 461, &c. The author's account of it as clear, as that of noted logicians, 462, &c. We talk like children about it, 169. 2. P. 463. The author and the bishop of Worcester, agree in the notion of it, 461, &c. How the mind forms the general idea of it, 464. The author makes not the being of it depend on the fancies of men, 466, &c. Idea of it obfcure, 477, &c. The author's principles confift with the certainty of its existence, 474. The author ridiculed not the notion of it, by his fimilies of the elephant and tortoife, 744. The certainty of the being of substance, don't suppose a clear idea of it, 742, &c. Subfiftence, a dialogue concerning it, 734. our ideas, 62, § 9. p. 97. § 6. Which train is the measure of it, 99. § 12.. Summum bonum, wherein it confifts, 153, § 55. Sun, the name of a species, though but one, 268. SI. Syllogifm, no help to reasoning, 423. § 4. Inconveniencies of fyllogifm, ibid.. Or the improvement of our knowledge, 430. $7. Whether, in fyllogifm, the middle terms may not be better placed, 430. §.8. May be about particulars, ibid. Certainty not to be placed in it, 702, &c. Denominations from time are relatives, 190.3 Toleration, neceffary in our ftate of knowledge, 416. § 4. Tradition, the older, the lefs credible, 418. § 10. Difcourfes, 401. § 9, 10, 11. Trinity, nothing in the effay against it, 458, &c. Verbal and real, 361. § 8, 9. General, feldom apprehended, but in words, 4 In what it confifts, p. 359. § 5. V VACUUM poffible, 92, § 22. Motion proves a vacuum, 93. $ 23. We have an idea of it, 57. 3. p. 58. § 5. Variety in men's purfuits, accounted for, 152. $54, &c. Virtue, what in reality, 25. § 18. What in its common application, 21. § 10, 11. Is preferable, under a bare poffibility of a future ftate, 160. § 70. How taken, 25. § 17, 18. Vice lies in wrong measures of good, 455. $16. Understanding, what, 133, 5, 6. Like a dark room, 83. § 17. When rightly used, 2. §.5. Three forts of perception in the understanding, 133. $5. Wholly paffive in the reception of fimple ideas, 52. $25. Uneafiness alone determines the will to a new ac tion, 141. 29, 31, 33, &c. Why it determines the will, 144. § 36, 37. Caufes of it, 154. § 57, &c. Unity, an idea, both of fenfation and reflection, 61. $7. I. II. Suggested by every thing, 112. Better known by reflection, than words, 141, $ 30. Voluntary, what, p. 133. § 5. p. 135. § 11. p. 140. $28. W Whole, bigger than its parts, its ufe, 375. $11. What determines the will, ibid. § 29. Terminates in them, 146. § 40. Is determined by the greateft, present, remove- Wit and Judgment, wherein different, 79. §. 2. Sects introduce words without fignification, The schools have coined multitudes of infig- And rendered others obfcure, 305, § 6. Inconftancy in their use, an abufe of words, Obfcurity, an abufe of words, 305. §.6. Who moft liable to this abuse of words, ibid. Making them ftand for real effences, which we know not, is an abufe of words, ib. §17, 18. How they fail in all thefe, 313. § 26, &c. How in modes and relations, ibid. § 33. Of obftinacy, 304. § 5. And of wrangling, 305. $6. Signify one thing, in enquiries; and another, The meaning of words is made known, in In mixed modes, by defining, ibid. §15. The ill confequence of learning words first, Or elfe to be explained, where the context de- How made general,. 243. §.3. Signifying infenfible things, derived from names Have no natural fignification, 245. § I.. Stand immediately for the ideas of the fpeaker, Yet with a double reference. I. To the ideas, in the hearer's mind, 246, 2. To the reality of things, ib. § 5. Why fome words of one language cannot be New words, or in new fignifications, are cau- How these come to be authorized, 633, 634. What words are moft doubtful, and why, ibid. What unintelligible, ibid. Are fitted to the ufe of common life, 293. § 2. Worship, not an innate idea, 32. § 7. END of the FIRST VOLUME. והאוניברסיטאי רושלים |