thach were if the sea; nor to the

part!

There is no

less confusion here . In the 3 rumpet he makes the stair synfbolical of in King, whereas it is the notart syfubol of minister of religion; he gives meanding to the wohoto sell From Heiben, (how could be is Genseric be the person syneboliiged ) be masker Jonke he

rivers, literal wormwoodl bohial. His interpreta. tion makes the expression chid of the watch's letterly

meaningless; if he be corect,

its shaftet. lieve chest at the

waters = In the exposition of the 4th trumpet, we have

so much bagueness & berbiage. All which this chap:

suis in 2 ppages. The fifte trumpet is ably illustrated

But we cannot concieve how Chosives can be called the opener of the bottomless pit; & quite

he wa

mantive m the

may

justify the Consistency of making the grass, kees' v6. literal, while alt the rest is symbolical; there be at very striking Cilicidence of literal strigen. bolical at the time, blut surely the latter is the primary senfe intended here. hor of we much like the explana tion of men desiring death & pinching it it to not tural, & Jake too refined. The sirth Humpset is exallently Incidated. We cannot, hot

not

prepared for an hour, a_day] 4. 2. prepared shading. in lieber, lay do. Nor do we sunderstanal_ A the author the here change the_me third of Calculating prophen his periodd from thach unver sully adopted, & which he hin self, adopts, since leulating the __ ther perivols-Set. link to be. eithets me that he chooses, but not both; else he need not won -der

at as sexying, that this wash of dealing with proplates shin bers lath's very like asif miten ded _ to props also on theory We-canseyh dolmitt bis mittpretation. "The = " power beings, in the

tcatcle et verbal resem Manner which we have censured before: on to notice the 20th,

(ol 11. 10.889), as another prouf Mr. Perth's wait of due attention to the precise in interpretationes.

Χ

symbolical language. (Heulx_ 4-3) the content follows to 251-362- How this exposition has been extorted from these

verses, is more than we can

imagine sese descending from heaven, he is identifieft within the Joi of man, by the various en blan which, intentify him in other poissages by the cloud (Aust Indartinest as Mr. Keithiw? have it, but of glotions Bregletness, the with at the trans filque

A mighty angel is

་།

.1.28;

overshadowed him, in while ascended & is to come agains; by the rainbow, as in Hové ir 3, X. Rev. drett. x by the brightness of his face & fact, lis in thatt. Kx. 2, Keb. 16, dét 1,27. But all this is nothing else ther the usual designatifus; & louse. quently, heasshomore to do with The Reformation than with any other, went at whe

may

present. Besides,

Shistorical narrative is more usually symbe bizjed-by what the posse. seprésenteft olves, then by what he is; the latter is Cokumenty the inho duction & preparation for the former, as the reader bunny exemplify for himself if sions passages. So far, then, To

the vision has no Connections

: with the Reformation