...which another had no title to, nor could without injury take from him. §.33. Nor was Misappropriation of any parcel of land, by improving it, any prejudice to any other man, fince there was ftill enough, and as good left ; and more than the yet unprovided could ufe. So that,...

...that was his property, which another had no title to, nor could without injury take from him. §. 33. Nor was this appropriation of any parcel of land, by improving it, any prejudice to any other flian» since there was still enough, and as good left; and more than the yet unprovided could use....

...to, nor could without injury take from him. S3. Nor was this appropriation of any parcel of land, hy improving it, any prejudice to any other man, since...in effect, there was never the less left for others hecause of his inclosure for himself: tor he that leaves as much as another can make use of, does as...

...that was his property, which another had no title to, nor could without injury take from him. §. 33. Nor was this appropriation of any parcel of land,...was never the less left for others because of his '/ inclosure for himself: for he that leaves as much as another can make use of, does as good as take...

...that was his property, which another had no title to, nor could without injury take from him. ^ 33. Nor was this appropriation of any parcel of land,...there was still enough, and as good left ; and more v than the yet unprovided could use. So that, in effect, 'here was never the less left for others because...

...something that was his property, which another had no title tp, nor could without injury take from him. 33. Nor was this appropriation of any parcel of land,...For he that leaves as much as another can make use pt does as good as take nothing at all. Nobody could think himself injured by the drinking of another...

...peopling of the great common of the world " the appropriation of land was similarly justifiable, " since there was still enough and as good left, and more than the yet unprovided could use." But however true this may have been in the beginnings of history, it would seem that at a comparatively...

...man tills, plants, improves, cultivates, and can use the product of, so much is his property. . . . Nor was this appropriation of any parcel of land,...it, any prejudice to any other man, since there was enough and as good left, and more than the yet unprovided could use."2 It would seem from these quotations...

...appropriation of any parcel of land, by improving it, any prejudice to any other man, since there was enough and as good left, and more than the yet unprovided could use." 2 It would seem from these quotations that Locke is himself aware that his theory gives only an explanation...

...something that was his property, which another had no title to, nor could without injury take it from him. Nor was this appropriation of any parcel of land,...was never the less left for others because of his inclosure for himself : for he that leaves as much as another can make use of, does as good as take...