صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني
[blocks in formation]

6 Let

him timely warning not to expect anything of a worldly
nature from him. With regard to the other, who desired
first to be permitted to go and bury his father, we may
with great probability conjecture that he made his filial
duty a mere pretence for temporizing. He was not per-
fectly sure that Jesus was the expected Messiah; and
while he wished to wait awhile until the true character of
Jesus should be more satisfactorily ascertained, he desired
to secure the advantage of an early profession. His
father, we may even suppose, was not yet dead, but only
very aged and infirm, and the request was in effect,
me first discharge my duty to my father, and then I will
come and be your disciple.” To him, therefore, the reply
of Jesus was most appropriate, “ Let the dead bury their
dead," that is, let those, and they are numerous enough,
who are dead-insensible to the claims of truth-to the
import of what I say and do, perform the necessary offices
for the dead. Such are the explanations of which these
passages are susceptible. They certainly appear natural
and probable. But observe, they are not given, they are
not hinted at, by the narrators; they are only indirectly,
undesignedly suggested by the general tenor of their
stories. They take no pains to guard against misappre-
hension, or to place the conduct of Jesus in the best light.
Here I behold the boundless confidence of truth.

There are even more striking instances of the entire absence of any disposition to exaggerate the things recorded in these books. Circumstances are related with the utmost brevity, and without any indication of fear

1

THE SNEERS OF THE ENEMIES OF JESUS.

49

cross.

which seem to be palpably inconsistent with the greatness and power ascribed to Jesus. We are told, for example, with an all-unconscious frankness, of the powerful appeals made to him by his enemies after he was fastened to the

They shook their heads at him, and cried, “ If thou be the Son of God, come down from the cross. He saved others, himself he cannot save. If he be the king of Israel, let him now come down from the cross and we will believe him. He trusted in God; let him deliver him now, if he will have him, for he said I am the son of God.” Who has ever paused over these words for the first time, without feeling that they contained a bitter force-without secretly saying to himself, O why did he not come down! If he had power to heal the sick and raise the dead, why did he not descend then from the cross and dissipate all doubt for ever!' Upon reflection, it is true, we recollect that he is never said to have used his extraordinary gifts for his own sake. It was not physical power that he sought to exercise, but moral power; the power of a love which no insensibility on the part of its objects could exhaust-of self-forgetfulness-of fortitude -of meek and patient endurance. He sought to show how one might do and endure, not from necessity, but voluntarily, to disclose the before unrevealed energy of a generous and self-denying free will. And had he relieved himself, had he shrunk from suffering pain and contempt, he must have forgotten his great spiritual purpose.

But, although this explanation is at hand, the narrators, be it remembered, do not suggest it. They record the

50

THE TRUSTWORTHINESS

[ocr errors]

sneers of his enemies, in all their naked force, unrelieved by a single word of comment. But I must pause here for the present.

Many a one, I imagine, when disturbed with doubts about the truth of the New Testament history, has secretly wished that he had been permitted to live in those days to be present on the spot, and then how easily might he have satisfied himself. For my own part, I confess, I shrink at the thought of such a trial. A trial it must have been, as every one will perceive, who is aware of his own weakness, and knows the tremendous power of the example of a multitude. I fear I should have wanted courage and candour to resist the accumulated authority of the rich, and great, and learned, of the mass of the people, and have fallen in with the general insensibility, or participated in those prepossessions which presented so effectual a barrier against the force of the words and works of Jesus. One thing does seem to me most desirable. Could I only have an account of those events from persons, or from only one person, whom I knew, in whose good sense, integrity, and fairness, I have perfect confidence, then I should have a ground for my faith, than which none could be surer. Could individuals of this character have been present, and could we have their testimony, nothing would be wanting. I open the four Gospels, and I feel that this want has been supplied most amply. When I read these books in the way in which I am now attempting to do it, I care not what names they bear, I see I know that they are the work

OF THE CHRISTIAN NARRATORS.

51

of an honest and impartial spirit. Nowhere in the writings of the dead, or in the conduct of the living, do I discern evidences of integrity and singleness of mind so luminous and affecting. I see none of the art of a fraudulent design-none of the incoherence of self-delusion: These histories command my cordial confidence. They are to me full of inspiration, not a vague mystical inspiration, but the inspiration of truth and honesty, the same spirit that breathes in every honest man, in every true word, the Holy Spirit. God give us this spirit without

measure!

CHAPTER IV.

THE SAME SUBJECT CONTINUED.

I only speak right on."

We have remarked upon the honesty of the Christian historians, particularly as it is evinced in the manner in which they speak of the principal personage of their narratives, the great object of their reverence and faith. They make no attempt to show him off. They manifest no apprehension about the impression that may be made by what they record. I am struck with the exhibition of

52

THE REFUSAL OF JESUS

their free, unguarded honesty, in the case which I am now about to mention.

We are given to understand with the utmost explicitness in these books, that Jesus was possessed of the most extraordinary powers—that he could heal the sick, give sight to the blind, and raise the dead, by a word. Numerous instances are detailed with remarkable particularity, in which, in the most public and satisfactory manner, he exercised these miraculous gifts. But on more than one occasion we are told that some of the principal men of the community came to him, and requested him to perform a miracle-to give them a sign, thus affording him an opportunity, as it would seem, of convincing them of his authority as a messenger from Heaven. “ How long,” said they, with apparently great plausibility, “how long dost thou make us to doubt? If thou be the Christ, tell us plainly.” On these occasions, as the historians have not hesitated to inform us, he directly and uniformly re fused to comply with the request made to him. They give us no explanation of the reasons of his refusal. They leave him open to the charge of having evađed an appeal apparently very fair.

It is not my immediate purpose to state the grounds of the conduct of Jesus in these cases. Still, as it admits of an explanation at once sound and rational, not only in accordance with but illustrative of the dignity of his character and the spirituality of his object, I may be permitted to hint at it in passing. The Jewish nation, as I have already had occasion to state, cherished the fond expecta

« السابقةمتابعة »