lasts, but will always remain in the community; because without this there can be no community, no commonwealth, which is contrary to the original agreement: so also when the society hath placed the legislative in any assembly of men, to continue in them and their successors, with direction and authority for providing such successors, the legislative can never revert to the people whilst that government lasts; because, having provided a legislative with power to continue for ever, they have given up their political power to the legislative, and cannot resume it. But if they have set limits to the duration of their legislative, and made this supreme power in any person, or assembly, only temporary; or else, when by the miscarriages of those in authority it is forfeited; upon the forfeiture, or at the determination of the time set, it reverts to the society, and the people have a right to act as supreme, and continue the legislative in themselves; or erect a new form, or under the old form place it in new hands, as they think good. CONTENTS OF THE TWO TREATISES ON GOVERNMENT. BOOK I. Page II. Of paternal and regal power - 215 222 IV. Of Adam's title to sovereignty, by donation, Gen. i. 28. 227 V. Of Adam's title to sovereignty, by the subjection of Eve 244 VI. Of Adam's title to sovereignty, by fatherhood VII. Of fatherhood and property considered together as foun- VIII. Of the conveyance of Adam's sovereign monarchical power 273 IX. Of monarchy, by inheritance from Adam BOOK II. - 338 III. Of the state of war - 347 - 383 VII. Of political or civil society VIII. Of the beginning of political societies IX. Of the ends of political society and government X. Of the forms of a commonwealth XI. Of the extent of the legislative power XII. Of the legislative, executive, and federative power of the XIII. Of the subordination of the powers of the commonwealth 426 XV. Of paternal, political, and despotical power, considered XIX. Of the dissolution of government - 464 IN D E X TO THE FIFTH VOL U M E. U M to it, A. Absolute monarchy, the absurdity of supposing it to descend from no proof of it from Jan 313 nor from the dispersion 319 214 not enjoyed by them, 321, 322 Nimrod had no right: 324 227 the dukes of Edom, and 452 inconsistent with civil 389 why the subjects of it 391, &c. how it came to be re- ibid. 267, &c. power over his children, 218 -220 222 ": |