صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني

are apt to fancy that knowledge grows, and knowlege only. I shall not stop to examine whether it be true (as is sometimes maintained) that all progress in human society is but the effect of the progress of knowledge for the present, it is enough to point out that knowledge is not the only possession of the human spirit in which progress can be traced.

We may, then, rightly speak of a childhood, a youth, and a manhood of the world. The men of the earliest ages were, in many respects, still children, as compared with ourselves, with all the blessings and with all the disadvantages that belong to childhood. We reap the fruits of their toil, and bear in our charácters the impress of their cultivation. Our characters have grown out of their history, as the character of the man grows out of the history of the child. There are matters in which the simplicity of childhood is wiser than the maturity of manhood; and in these they were wiser than we. There are matters in which the child is nothing, and the man everything; and in these we are the gainers. And the process by which we have either lost or gained, corresponds, stage by stage, with the process by which the infant is trained for youth, and the youth for manhood.

This training has three stages. In childhood, we are subject to positive rules, which we cannot understand, but are bound implicitly to obey. In youth, we are subject to the influence of example; and soon break loose from all rules, unless illustrated and enforced by the higher teaching which example imparts. In manhood, we are comparatively free from external restraints; and, if we are to learn, must be our own instructors. First come Rules, then Examples, then

governors until the Then, when the fit

Principles. First comes the Law, then the Son of Man, then the Gift of the Spirit. The world was once a child, under tutors and time appointed by the Father. season had arrived, the Example, to which all ages should turn, was sent to teach men what they ought to be. Then the human race was left to itself, to be guided by the teaching of the Spirit within.

The education of the world, like that of the child, begins with Law. It is impossible to explain the reasons of all the commands that you give to a child; and you do not endeavor to do so. When he is to go to bed; when he is to get up; how he is to sit, stand, eat, drink; what answers he is to make when spoken to; what he may touch, and what he may not; what prayers he shall say, and when; what lessons he is to learn, every detail of manners and of conduct the careful mother teaches her child, and requires implicit obedience. Mingled together in her teaching are commands of the most trivial character, and commands of the gravest importance; their relative value marked by a difference of manner rather than by anything else, since to explain it is impossible. Meanwhile, to the child, obedience is the highest duty; affection the highest stimulus; the mother's word the highest sanction. The conscience is alive; but it is, like the other faculties at that age, irregular, undeveloped, easily deceived. The mother does not leave it uncultivated, nor refuse sometimes to explain her motives for commanding or forbidding; but she never thinks of putting the judgment of the child against her own, nor of considering the child's conscience as having a right to free action.

As the child grows older, the education changes

its character; not so much in regard to the sanction of its precepts as in regard to their tenor. More stress is laid upon matters of real duty, less upon matters of mere manner. Falsehood, quarrelling, bad temper, greediness, indolence, are more attended to than times of going to bed, or fashions of eating, or postures in sitting. The boy is allowed to feel, and to show that he feels, the difference between different commands: but he is still not left to himself; and, though points of manner are not put on a level with points of conduct, they are by no means neglected. Moreover, while much stress is laid upon his deeds, little is laid upon his opinions: he is rightly supposed not to have any, and will not be allowed to plead them as a reason for disobedience.

After a time, however, the intellect begins to assert a right to enter into all questions of duty; and the intellect, accordingly, is cultivated. The reason is appealed to in all questions of conduct. The consequences of folly or sin are pointed out; and the punishment which, without any miracle, God invariably brings upon those who disobey his natural laws: how, for instance, falsehood destroys confidence, and incurs contempt; how indulgence in appetite tends to brutal and degrading habits; how ill-temper may end in crime, and must end in mischief. Thus the conscience is reached through the understanding.

Now, precisely analogous to all this is the history of the education of the early world. The earliest commands almost entirely refer to bodily appetites and animal passions. The earliest wide-spread sin was brutal violence. That wilfulness of temper, those germs of wanton cruelty, which the mother corrects so easily in her infant, were developed, in the earliest

form of human society, into a prevailing plague of wickedness. The few notices which are given of that state of mankind do not present a picture of mere lawlessness, such as we find among the mediæval nations of Europe, but of blind, gross ignorance of themselves and all around them. Atheism is possible now: but Lamech's presumptuous comparison of himself with God is impossible; and the thought of building a tower high enough to escape God's wrath could enter no man's dreams. We sometimes see in very little children a violence of temper which seems hardly human: add to such a temper the strength of a full-grown man, and we shall perhaps understand what is meant by the expression, that the earth was filled with violence.

Such was

Violence was followed by sensuality. the sin of Noah, Ham, Sodom, Lot's daughters, and the guilty Canaanites. Animal appetites-the appetites which must be subdued in childhood, if they are to be subdued at all-were still the temptation of mankind. Such sins are, it is true, prevalent in the world even now: but the peculiarity of these early forms of licentiousness is their utter disregard of every kind of restraint; and this constitutes their childish character.

The education of this early race may strictly be said to begin when it was formed into the various masses out of which the nations of the earth have sprung. The world, as it were, went to school, and was broken up into classes. Before that time it can hardly be said that any great precepts had been given. The only commands which claim an earlier date are the prohibitions of murder and of eating blood; and these may be considered as given to all alike. But

the whole lesson of humanity was too much to be learned by all at once. Different parts of it fell to the task of different parts of the human race; and for a long time, though the education of the world flowed in parallel channels, it did not form a single stream.

The Jewish nation, selected among all as the depositary of what may be termed, in a pre-eminent sense, religious truth, received, after a short preparation, the Mosaic system. This system is a mixture of moral and positive commands: the latter, precise and particular, ruling the customs, the festivals, the worship, the daily food, the dress, the very touch; the former, large, clear, simple, peremptory. There is very little directly spiritual. No freedom of conduct or of opinion is allowed. The difference between different precepts is not forgotten, nor is all natural judgment in morals excluded; but the reason for all the minute commands is never given. Why they may eat the sheep, and not the pig, they are not told. The commands are not confined to general principles, but run into such details as to forbid tattooing or disfiguring the person; to command the wearing of a blue fringe, and the like. That such commands should be sanctioned by divine authority is utterly irreconcilable with our present feelings; but in the Mosaic system the same peremptory legislation deals with all these matters, whether important or trivial. The fact is, that, however trivial they might be in relation to the authority which they invoked, they were not trivial in relation to the people who were to be governed and taught.

The teaching of the law was followed by the comments of the prophets. It is impossible to mistake

« السابقةمتابعة »