...plan. " Episcopacy and monarchy," he says, '•' are, in their frame and constitution, best suited to each other. Episcopacy can never thrive in a republican government, nor republican principles in an episcopal church." 1 What Dr. Chandler says in the Defence of his Appeal, in reference to the passage...

...the plan. " Episcopacy a11d monarchy," he says, " are, in their frame and constitution, best suited to each other. Episcopacy can never thrive in a republican government, nor republican principles in an episcopal church." 1 What Dr. Chandler says in the Defence of Ms Appeal, in reference to the passage...

...introduced into America, says, " Episcopacy and monarchy are, in their frame and constitution, best suited to each other. Episcopacy can never thrive in a republican government, nor republican principles in an Episcopal church." • • • " He, that prefers monarchy in the State, is more likely to approve...

...says,* ' But, notwithstanding, episcopacy and monarchy are, in their frame and constitution, best suited to each other. Episcopacy can never thrive in a republican government, nor republican principles in an episcopal * Appeal on behalf of the Ch. of Eng. in America, N. York, 1707. p. 115. church. For the...

...that ' Episcopacy and monarchy are in their frame and construction best suited to each other, — that Episcopacy can never thrive in a republican government, nor republican principles in an Episcopal church, — and that as they are mutually adapted to each other, so they are mutually introductive...

...as natural allies." It was the declaration of Dr. Chandler, a distinguished Episcopal divine, that " Episcopacy can never thrive in a republican government, nor republican principles in an Episcopal church." The admitting of the laity to some share in its government is pronounced by Bishop...

...would gradually usurp power. He sees a particularly dangerous tendency in Chandler's statement that "Episcopacy can never thrive in a Republican government, nor Republican principles in an Episcopal Church" (p. 78). 2 Appeal Defended, 117. show that bishops would be able to do what the commissaries...

...reference to that action, says: "Episcopacy and monarchy are, in their form and constitution, best suited to each other. Episcopacy can never thrive in a Republican Government, nor Republican principles in an Episcopal church." But with the Presbyterians and other so-called dissenters, the case was entirely...

...says,* 'But, notwithstanding, episcopacy and monarchy are, in their frame and constitution, best suited to each other. Episcopacy can never thrive in a republican government, nor republican principles in an episcopal church. For the same reasons, in a mixed monarchy, no form of ecclesiastical government can...

...them, and who said that " Episcopacy and monarchy are, in their form and constitution, best suited to each other. Episcopacy can never thrive in a republican government, nor republican principles in an Episcopal Church," — which statement is wholly controverted by subsequent events. But Dr. Graham,...