...difference, and is precisely an< numerically the same as the relation affirmed between C and D 'ir " C differs from D." ^/And this doctrine must be held,...other relations; relations do not have instances, buj. are strictly the same in all propositions in which they occuiy> x^Ve may now sum up the main points...

...urged that the external theory assumes60 the definition of the general effectiveness of a relation : "The relation affirmed between A and B in the proposition...C differs from D. ' And this doctrine must be held to be true of all other relations; relations do not have instances, but are strictly the same in all...

...indefinite number of different complexes.1 1 Of. eg Eussell, 1. c., pp. 51, 52: 'I conclude, then, that the relation affirmed between A and B in the proposition...strictly the same in all propositions in which they occur.' I have assumed that the simple Qualities (like Eelations) 'do not have instances': eg that...

...indefinite number of different complexes. 1 1 Of. eg Russell, Ic, pp. 51, 52 : 'I conclude, then, that the relation affirmed between A and B in the proposition...relation affirmed between C and D in " C differs from Z)". And this doctrine must be held, for the same reasons, to be true of all other relations: relations...

...indefinite number of different complexes.1 1 Of. eg Eussell, lc, pp. 51, 52: 'I conclude, then, that the relation affirmed between A and B in the proposition...numerically the same as the relation affirmed between G and D in " C differs from D ". And this doctrine must be held, for the same reasons, to be true of...

...indefinite number of different complexes.1 1 Cf. eg Russell, Lc., pp. 51, 52: 'I conclude, then, that the relation affirmed between A and B in the proposition "A differs from 11 " is the general relation of difference, and is precisely nnd numerically the same as the relation...

...different differences will not be in any definable sense instances of difference. I conclude then that the relation affirmed between A and B in the proposition...affirmed between C and D in ' C differs from D.' And for the same reasons this doctrine must be held to be true of all relations; relations do not have...

...different differences will not be in any definable sense instances of difference. I conclude, then, that the relation affirmed between A and B in the proposition...strictly the same in all propositions in which they occur. 18 This argument can be made more perspicuous by utilizing a paraphrase made by Weitz, one that...

...inadmissible.4 By the time he came to write The Principles, however, he had rejected SR in favour of UR: '[Relations do not have instances, but are strictly the same in all propositions in which they occur' (p. 52). '[T]here are logical reasons for supposing that there are no such entities at all as...

...the time he came to write The Principles, however, he had rejected SR in favour of UR: '[RJelations do not have instances, but are strictly the same in all propositions in which they occur' (p. 52). '[T]here are logical reasons for supposing that there are no such entities at all as...