 | United States. Congress. House. Select Committee on Post-war Military Policy - 1945 - عدد الصفحات: 734
...Mffler, where the Court said : The Militia which the States wore expected to maintain is set in contract with Troops, which they were forbidden to keep without the consent of Congress. The sentiment of the timo strongly disfavored standing armies; the common view was that «defínate defense of country and... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1965 - عدد الصفحات: 880
...20 United State* v. Miller, 307 US 174, 179, 180-182 (1939). The Court also noted at 178-17!) that "The Militia which the States were expected to maintain and train Is set m contrast with Troops which they were forbidden to keep without the consent of The sentiment of the... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means - 1966 - عدد الصفحات: 1224
...=° Vnitrd Stain v. Miller, 307 US 174 (1!)38) at 179, 1SO-182. The Court also noted at 17S-17!) that "the militia which the States were expected to maintain...the consent of Congress. The sentiment of the time stronply disfavored standing armies ; the common view was that adequate defense of country and laws... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1967 - عدد الصفحات: 1216
...effectiveness of such forces the deolai and guarantee of the Second Amendment were made. It must be interpret« applied with that end in view. The Militia which the States were expected to maintain and train is contrast with Troops which they were forbidden to keep without the cons« Congress. The sentiment of... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1967 - عدد الصفحات: 1220
...(1961). "Vniteil KlalcK v. .Miller, 307 US 174, 179. 1SO-1S2 (1939). The Court also noted at 171-178 thnt "The Militia which the States were expected to maintain and train Is set In <*f.ntrnst with Troops which they were forhidden to keep without the consent of Congress. The sentiment... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Judiciary - 1972 - عدد الصفحات: 458
...the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress.' With obvious purpose to assure the continuation and render possible the effectiveness...be interpreted and applied with that end in view." United States v. Miller, 307 US 174, 17& See also. United States v. Tot, 131 F.2d 261 (3d Clr. 1942),... | |
| |
With obvious purpose to assure the continuation and render possible the effectiveness of such forces the declaration and guarantee of the Second Amendment were made. It must be interpreted and applied with that end in view. 
