Learn to discern by exercise,
ii. 301, § 21. Much quicker would not be
useful to us, ii. 16, § 12. Our organs of sense suited to our state, ibid. &c. § 12, 13.
Sensible knowledge is as certain
as we need, iii. 73, § 8. Sensible knowledge goes not
beyond the present act, iii. 74, § 9.
Shame, i. 235, § 17. Simple ideas, i. 99, § 1.
Not made by the mind, ibid. § 2.
Power of the mind over them,
The materials of all our know- ledge, i. 116, § 10. All positive, i. 117, § 1. Very different from their causes, i. 117, § 2, 3. Sin, with different men, stands for different actions, i. 50, § 19.
Solidity, i. 105, 106, § 1. Inseparable from body, i. 106, § 1.
By it body fills space, ibid. § 2.
This idea got by touch, i. 105, § 1.
How distinguished from space, i. 107, § 3.
How from hardness, i. 108, § 4. Something from eternity demon- strated, iii. 56, § 3: iii. 59, § 8.
Sorrow, i. 233, § 8. Soul thinks not always, i. 86, § 9, &c.
Not in sound sleep, i. 88, § 11, &c.
Its immateriality, we know not, ii. 331. 358, § 6: ii. 345, &c.
Religion, not concerned in the soul's immateriality, ii. 359, 360, § 6.
Our ignorance about it, ii. 70, § 27.
The immortality of it, not proved by reason, ii. 346, &c.
It is brought to light by re- velation, ibid.
Sound, its modes, i. 225, § 3. Space, its idea got by sight and
touch, i. 158, § 2.
Its modifications, i. 158, § 4. Not body, i. 163, 164, § 11, 12.
Its parts inseparable, i. 164, § 13.
Immoveable, i. 164, 165, § 14. Whether body, or spirit, i. 165, § 16.
Whether substance, or ac- cident, i. 165, § 17. Infinite, i. 168, § 21: i. 210, § 4.
Ideas of space and body di- stinct, i. 170, 171, § 24, 25. Considered as a solid, i. 200, 201, § 11.
Hard to conceive any real
being void of space, i. 201. Species; why changing one simple idea of the complex one is thought to change the species in modes, but not in substances, ii. 280, § 19. Of animals and vegetables, mostly distinguished by figure, ii. 228, § 29. Of other things, by colour, ibid.
Made by the understanding, for communication, ii. 201, § 9.
No species of mixed modes without a name, ii. 203, § 11. Of substances, are determined by the nominal essence, ii. 212. 215. 218, &c. § 7, 8. 11. 13.
Not by substantial forms, ii.
Nor by the real essence, ii. 219, § 18: ii. 223, § 25. Of spirits, how distinguished, ii. 215, § 11.
More species of creatures above than below us, ii. 216, § 12.
Of creatures very gradual, ib. What is necessary to the making of species, by real essences, ii. 218, § 14, &c. Of animals and plants, cannot be distinguished by propaga- tion, ii. 222, § 23. Of animals and vegetables, distinguished principally by the shape and figure; of other things, by the colour, ii. 228, § 29.
Of man, likewise, in part, ii. 224, § 26.
Instance, abbot of St. Martin, ii. 225.
Is but a partial conception of what is in the individuals, ii. 231, § 32.
It is the complex idea, which the name stands for, that makes the species, ii. 234, § 35. Man makes the species, or
sorts, ii. 235, § 36, 37. The foundation of it is in the similitude found in things, ibid. § 36, 37. Every distinct, abstract idea makes a different species, ibid. § 38. Speech, its end, ii. 158, § 1, 2. Proper speech, ii. 165, § 8. Intelligible, ibid.
Spirits, the existence of spirits not knowable, iii. 76, § 12. How it is proved, ibid. Operation of spirits on bodies,
not conceivable, ii. 379, §28. What knowledge they have, of bodies, ii. 302, § 23.
Separate, how their knowledge
may exceed ours, i. 141, § 9. We have as clear a notion of the substance of spirit as of body, ii. 11, § 5.
A conjecture, concerning one way of knowledge wherein spirits excel us, ii. 18, § 13. Our ideas of spirit, ii. 20, § 15. As clear as that of body, ibid. : ii. 23, § 22. Primary ideas belonging to spirits, ii. 21, § 18.
Move, ii. 21, 22, § 19, 20. Ideas of spirit and body com- pared, ii. 23, § 22: ii. 29, § 30.
The existence of spirits, as easy to be admitted, as that of bodies, ii. 27, § 28. We have no idea, how spirits communicate their thoughts, ii. 32, § 36.
How far we are ignorant of the being, species, and pro- perties of spirits, ii. 378, § 27.
The word, spirit, does not ne- cessarily denote imma- teriality, ii. 332. The scripture speaks of ma- terial spirits, ii. 333. Stupidity, i. 141, § 8. Substance, ii. 1, § 1. No idea of it, i. 72, § 18. Not very knowable, ibid. Our certainty, concerning sub- stances, reaches but a little way, ii. 390, 391, § 11, 12: iii. 20, § 15.
The confused idea of substance in general, makes always a part of the essence of the species of substances, ii. 220, § 21.
In substances, we must rectify the signification of their names, by the things, more than by definitions, ii. 303, § 24.
Their ideas single, or col- lective, i. 147, § 6. We have no distinct idea of substance, i. 166, § 18, 19. We have no idea of pure sub-
stance, ii. 2, 3, § 2.
Our ideas of the sorts of sub-
stances, ii. 5-10, § 3, 4 ii. 11, § 6. Observables, in our ideas of substances, ii. 33, § 37. Collective ideas of substances, ii. 34, &c.
They are single ideas, ii. 35, § 2.
Three sorts of substances, ii. 48, § 2.
The ideas of substances have
in the mind a double re- ference, ii. 129, § 6. The properties of substances numerous, and not all to be known, ii. 133, 134, § 9, 10. The perfectest ideas of sub-
stances, ii. 12, § 7. Three sorts of ideas make our complex one of substances, ii. 14, § 9. Substance, not discarded by the essay, ii. 5, &c. note. The author's account of it as clear, as that of noted logi- cians, ii. 6, &c. note. We talk like children about it, ii. 4, § 2: ii. 8, note. The author makes not the being of it depend on the fancies of men, ii. 1, &c. note.
Idea of it obscure, ii. 331, &c. note.
The author's principles consist with the certainty of its ex- istence, ii. 2, note. Subtilty, what, ii. 272, § 8. Succession, an idea got chiefly
from the train of our ideas,
i. 115, § 9: i. 177, § 6.
Taste and smells, their modes, i. 225, 226, § 5. Testimony, how it lessens its force, iii. 108, § 10. Thinking, i. 228.
Modes of thinking, ibid. § 1: i. 229, § 2.
Men's ordinary way of think- ing, iii. 2, § 4.
An operation of the soul, i. 87, § 10.
Without memory, useless, i. 91, § 15.
Time, what, i. 181, § 17, 18. Not the measure of motion, i. 185, 186, § 22. And place, distinguishable por- tions of infinite duration and expansion, i. 195, § 5, 6. Two-fold, i. 195, 196, § 6, 7. Denominations from time are relatives, ii. 44, § 3.
Toleration, necessary in our state of knowledge, iii. 103, § 4.
Which train is the measure of Tradition, the older, the less
credible, iii. 108, § 10.
Trifling propositions, iii. 43. Discourses, iii. 50-52, § 9, 10, 11. Truth, what, iii. 1, § 2: iii. 3, § 5 iii. 6, § 9.
Of thought, iii. 1, § 3: iii. 6, § 9.
Of words, iii. 1, § 3. Verbal and real, iii. 5, 6, § 8, 9.
Moral, iii. 7, § 11. Metaphysical, ii. 136, § 2: iii. 7, § 11. General, seldom apprehended, but in words, iii. 8, § 2. In what it consists, iii. 3, § 5. Love of it necessary, iii. 147, § 1.
How we may know we love it, iii. 147, § 1.
Vacuum possible, i. 169, § 22. Motion proves a vacuum, i. 179, § 23.
We have an idea of it, i. 107,
§ 3: i. 109, § 5.
Variety in men's pursuits, ac- counted for, i. 272, 273, § 54, &c. Virtue, what, in reality, i. 49, § 18.
What in its common applica-
tion, i. 42, § 10, 11. Is preferable, under a bare possibility of a future state, i. 286, 287, § 70.
How taken, i. 49, § 17, 18. Vice lies in wrong measures of good, iii. 172, § 16. Understanding, what, i. 239, § 5, 6.
Like a dark room, i. 152, § 17. When rightly used, i. 3, 4, § 5. Three sorts of perception in the
understanding, i. 239, § 5. Wholly passive in the reception of simple ideas, i. 98, § 25.
Uneasiness alone determines the will to a new action, i. 252, &c. § 29. 31. 33, &c. Why it determines the will, i. 257, 258, § 36, 37. Causes of it, i. 275, § 57, &c. Unity, an idea, both of sensation and reflection, i. 115, § 7. Suggested by every thing, i. 202, 203, § 1. Universality, is only in signs, ii. 172, § 11.
Universals, how made, i. 148, § 9. Volition, what, i. 239, §5: i. 244, § 15: i. 252, § 28. Better known by reflection,
than words, i. 253, § 30. Voluntary, what, i. 239, § 5: i. 242, § 11: i. 251, § 27.
What is, is, is not universally assented to, i. 14, § 4. Where and when, i. 197, § 8. Whole bigger than its parts, its use, iii. 30, § 11.
And part not innate ideas, i. 59, § 6.
Will, what, i. 239, § 5, 6: i. 244, 245, § 16: i. 252, § 29.
What determines the will, ib. § 29.
Often confounded with desire, i. 253, § 30.
Is conversant only about our own actions, i. 253, 254, § 30. Terminates in them, i. 261, § 40.
Is determined by the greatest, present, removeable uneasi- ness, ib.
Wit and judgment, wherein dif- ferent, i. 144, § 2. Words, an ill use of words, one great hinderance of know- ledge, ii. 381, § 30.
This abuse of words is a cause
of obstinacy in error, ii. 278, § 16. Making them stand for real
essences, which we know not, is an abuse of words, ii. 278, 279, § 17, 18. The supposition of their cer- tain, evident signification, an abuse of words, ii. 282, § 22.
Use of words is, 1. To com- municate ideas. 2. With quickness. 3. To convey knowledge, ii. 284, § 23, 24.
How they fail in all these, ii.
known, in simple ideas, by showing, ii. 297, § 14.
In mixed modes, by defining, ibid. § 15.
In substances, by showing and defining too, ii. 300, § 19: ii. 301, 302, § 21, 22. The ill consequence of learning words first, and their mean- ing afterwards, ii. 303, § 24. No shame to ask men the meaning of their words, where they are doubtful, ii. 304, § 25.
Are to be used constantly in
the same sense, ii. 306, § 26. Or else to be explained, where the context determines it not, ii. 306, § 27.
How made general, ii. 158, § 3. Signifying insensible things, derived from names of sen- sible ideas, ii. 159, § 5. Have no natural signification, ii. 161, § 1.
But by imposition, ii. 165, § 8. Stand immediately for the ideas
of the speaker, ii. 161-163, § 1, 2, 3.
Yet with a double reference. 1. To the ideas, in the hearer's mind, ii. 163, § 4.
2. To the reality of things, ii. 164, § 5.
Apt, by custom, to excite ideas, ii. 164, § 6.
Often used without significa- tion, ibid. § 7. Most general, ii. 166, § 1. Why some words of one lan- guage cannot be translated into those of another, ii. 200, § 8.
Why I have been so large on words, ii. 206, § 16. New words, or in new significa- tions, are cautiously to be used, ii. 244, § 51.
Civil use of words, ii. 251, § 3.
« السابقةمتابعة » |