Specific essences of mixed modes are of men's making, and how, ii. 196, § 3. Though arbitrary, yet not at random, ii. 199, § 7. Of mixed modes, why called notions, ii. 204, § 12. What, ii. 208, § 2. Relate only to species, ii. 209, § 4.
Real essences, what, ii. 211, § 6.
We know them not, ii. 213, § 9.
Our specific essences of sub- stances are nothing but col- léctions of sensible ideas, ii. 220, § 21. Nominal are made by the mind, ii. 224, § 26. But not altogether arbitrarily, ii. 227, § 28. Nominal essences of sub- stances, how made, ii. 227, 228, § 28, 29. Are very various, ii. 229, § 30: ii. 230, § 31. Of species, are the abstract ideas, the names stand for, ii. 173, § 12: ii. 184, § 19. Are of man's making, ii. 178, § 12. But founded in the agreement of things, ii. 179, § 13. Real essences determine not our species, ii. 180, § 13. Every distinct, abstract idea, with a name, is a distinct essence of a distinct spe- cies, ib. § 14.
Real essences of substances, not to be known, iii. 18, § 12. Essential, what, ii. 208, § 2: i1. 210, § 5.
Nothing essential to indi- viduals, ii. 209, § 4. But to species, ii. 211, § 6. Essential difference, what, ii. 210, § 5.
Eternal verities, iii. 77, § 14. Eternity, in our disputes and
reasonings about it, why we are apt to blunder, ii. 118, $15.
Whence we get its idea, i. 188, § 27.
Evil, what, i. 262, § 42. Existence, an idea of sensation and reflection, i. 115, § 7. Our own existence we know intuitively, iii. 55, § 2.
And cannot doubt of it, ib. Of created things, knowable only by our senses, iii. 68, § 1.
Past existence known only by Tuemory, iii. 75, § 11. Expansion, boundless, i. 193, § 2.
Should be applied to space in general, i. 172, § 27.
Experience often helps us, where we think not that it does, i. 132, § 8.
Extasy, i. 228, § 1.
Extension: we have no distinct ideas of very great, or very extension, ii. 119,
Of body, incomprehensible, ii. 23, § 23, &c. Denominations, from place and extension, are many of them relatives, ii. 45, § 5. And body not the same thing, i. 163, § 11.
Its definition insignificant, i. 165, § 15.
Of body and of space how di- stinguished, i. 109, § 5: i. 172, § 27.
Faculties of the mind first ex- ercised, i. 151, § 14.
Are but powers, i, 245, §
Operate not, i. 246, 247, §
18. 20. Faith and opinion, as distin- guished from knowledge, what, iii. 97, § 2, 3. And knowledge, their dif- ference, ib. § 3. What, iii. 112, § 14.
Not opposite to reason, iii. 136, § 24.
As contra-distinguished to rea- son, what, iii. 138, § 2. Cannot convince us of any thing contrary to our rea- son, iii. 141, &c. § 5, 6. 8.
Matter of faith is only divine
revelation, iii. 145, § 9. Things above reason are only proper matters of faith, iii. 144, § 7 iii. 145, § 9. Falsehood, what it is, iii. 6, § 9. Fancy, i. 141, § 8.
Fantastical ideas, ii. 122, § 1. Fear, i. 233, § 10. Figure, i. 159, § 5, 6. Figurative speech, an abuse of language, ii. 288, § 34.
Finite, and infinite, modes quantity, i. 208, § 1. All positive ideas of quantity, finite, i. 213, § 8. Forms, substantial forms distin- guish not species, ii. 215, § 10.
Free, how far a man is so, i. 248, § 21.
A man not free to will, or not to will, i. 248-250, § 22, 23, 24. Freedom belongs only to agents, i. 246, § 19.
Wherein it consists, i. 251, § 27.
Free will, liberty belongs not to
the will, i. 243, § 14. Wherein consists that, which is called free will, i. 250, § 24: i. 267, § 47.
General ideas, how made, i. 148, § 9.
Knowledge, what, ii. 283, § 31. Propositions cannot be known to be true, without knowing the essence of the species, iii. 8, § 4.
Words, how made, ii.164, 165, § 6, 7, 8.
Belongs only to signs, ii. 172, § 11.
Gentlemen should not be igno- rant, iii. 163, § 6. Genus and species, what, ii. 176, § 10.
Are but Latin names for sorts,
Is but a partial conception of what is in the species, ii. 231, § 32.
And species adjusted to the end of speech, ii. 233, § 33. And species are made in order to general names, ii. 236, § 39. Generation, ii. 43, § 2.
God immoveable, because infinite, ii. 22, § 21.
Fills immensity, as well as eternity, i. 194, § 3. His duration not like that of the creatures, i. 201, 202, § 12.
An idea of God not innate,
The best notions of God, got by thought and application, i. 70, § 15.
Notions of God frequently not worthy of him, i. 71, § 16. The being of a God certain,
ibid. proved, iii. 55. As evident, as that the three angles of a triangle are equal to two right ones, i. 77, § 22. Yea, as that two opposite angles are equal, i. 71, § 16. More certain than any other existence without us, iii. 58, § 6.
The idea of God, not the only proof of his existence, ibid. § 7.
The being of a God the founda- tion of morality and divinity, iii. 58, § 7.
How we make our idea of God,
ii. 31, § 33, 34. Gold is fixed; the various sig- nifications of this proposi- tion, ii. 244, § 50. Water strained through it, i. 109, § 4.
Good and evil, what, i. 231, § 2:
The greater good determines
not the will, i. 256, § 35: i. 259, § 38: i. 264, § 44. Why, i. 265, § 44: i. 266, § 46: i. 277, &c. § 59, 60. 64, 65.68.
Twofold, i. 278, § 61. Works on the will only by de- sire, i. 266, § 46. Desire of good how to be raised, i. 266, 267, § 46, 47.
Habit, i. 300, § 10.
Habitual actions pass often with- out our notice, i. 134, § 10. Hair, how it appears in a micro- scope, ii. 15, § 11.
How we come to rest in narrow
happiness, i. 277, § 59, 60. Hardness, what, i. 108, § 4. Hatred, i. 232, § 5 : i. 234, § 14. Heat and cold, how the sensation of them both is produced, by the same water, at the same time, i. 125, § 21. History, what history of most au- thority, iii. 109, § 11. Hope, i. 233, § 9. Hypotheses, their use, ii. 89, § 13.
Are to be built on matter of fact, i. 88, § 10.
Ice and water whether distinct species, ii. 218, § 13.
Idea, what, i. 119, § 8. Ideas, their original in children, i. 57, § 2: i. 68, § 13. None innate, i. 71, 72, § 17. Because not remembered, i. 73, § 20.
Are what the mind is employed
about, in thinking, i. 82, § 1. All from sensation, or reflec- tion, ibid. § 2, &c.
How this is to be understood, ii. 334.
Their way of getting, observa-
ble in children, i. 85, § 6. Why some have more, some fewer ideas, i. 85, § 7. Of reflection got late, and in some very negligently, i. 86, § 8.
Their beginning and increase
in children, i. 96-98, § 21, 22, 23, 24.
Their original in sensation and reflection, i. 98, § 24. Of one sense, i. 104, § 1. Want names, i. 105, § 2. Of more than one sense, i. 111.
Of reflection, i. 111, § 1. Of sensation and reflection, i. 112, § 1.
As in the mind, and in things, must be distinguished, i. 119, § 7.
Not always resemblances, i. 122, § 15, &c. Which are first, is not material to know, i. 131, § 7. Of sensation often altered by the judgment, i. 132, § 8. Principally those of sight, i. 133, § 9.
Of reflection, i. 151, § 14. Simple ideas men agree in, i. 173, § 28. Moving in a regular train in our minds, i. 178, § 9. Such as have degrees want names, i. 226, § 6. Why some have names, and others not, ibid. § 7. Original, i. 292, § 73. All complex ideas resolvable into simple, i. 298, § 9. What simple ideas have been most modified, i. 299, § 10. Our complex idea of God, and other spirits, common in every thing, but infinity, ii. 32, 33, 36.
Clear and obscure, ii. 111, §2. Distinct and confused, ii. 112, § 4.
May be clear in one part and obscure in another, ii. 117, § 13.
Real and fantastical, ii. 122, § 1.
Simple are all real, ii. 122, § 2. And adequate, ii. 125, § 2. What ideas of mixed modes are
fantastical, ii. 123, 124, § 4. What ideas of substances are fantastical, ii. 124, § 5. Adequate and inadequate, ii. 125, § 1.
How said to be in things, ibid. § 2.
Modes are all adequate ideas,
Unless, as referred to names, ii. 128, § 4, 5.
Of substances inadequate, ii. 134, § 11.
1. As referred to real essences,
ii. 129-131, § 6, 7. 2. As referred to a collection of simple ideas, ii. 132, § 8. Simple ideas are perfect exluña, ii. 134, § 12.
Of substances are perfect εκτυπα, ii. 135, § 13. Of modes are perfect arche- types, ii. 136, § 14. True or false, ibid. § 1, &c. When false, ii. 146, &c. § 21,
22, 23, 24, 25.
As bare appearances in the mind, neither true nor false, ii. 137, § 3.
As referred to other men's ideas, or to real existence, or to real essences, may be true or false, ibid. § 4, 5. Reason of such reference, ii. 138, 139, § 6, 7, 8. Simple ideas referred to other men's ideas, least apt to be false, ii. 139, § 9.
Complex ones, in this respect,
more apt to be false, espe- cially those of mixed modes, ii. 140, § 10. Simple ideas, referred to exist- ence, are all true, ii. 141, § 14: ii. 143, § 16. Though they should be dif- ferent in different men, ii. 142, § 15. Complex ideas of modes are all true, ii. 143, 144, § 17.. Of substances when false, ii. 146, § 21, &c.
When right, or wrong, ii. 148, § 26.
That we are incapable of, ii.
373, 374, § 23.
That we cannot attain, because
of their remoteness, ii. 375, § 24. Because of their minuteness, ii. 376, § 25.
Simple have a real conformity
to things, ii. 385, § 4. And all others, but of sub- stances, ii. 386, § 5. Simple cannot be got by de- finitions of words, ii. 190, § 11.
But only by experience, ii. 193, § 14.
Of mixed modes, why most
compounded, ii. 204, § 13. Specific, of mixed modes, how
at first made: instance in kinneah and niouph, ii. 239, 240, § 44, 45.
Of substances: instance in zahab, ii. 241, 242, § 46, 47. Simple ideas and modes have
all abstract, as well as con- crete, names, ii. 249, § 2. Of substances, have scarce any abstract names, ibid. Different in different men,
Of a plant, wherein it consists, ii. 50, § 4.
Of animals, ii. 50, 51, § 5. Of a man, ii. 51, § 6 : ii. 52, § 8. Unity of substance does not always make the identity, ii. 52, § 7. Personal identity, ii. 55, § 9. Depends on the same con- sciousness, ibid. § 10. Continued existence makes identity, ii. 71, § 29. And diversity, in ideas, the first perception of the mind, ii. 309, § 4.
Idiots and madmen, i. 150, § 12,
Ignorance, our ignorance in- finitely exceeds our know- ledge, ii. 373, § 22. Causes of ignorance, ii. 373, 374, § 23.
1. For want of ideas, ibid. 2. For want of a discoverable connexion between the ideas we have, ii. 379, § 28. 3. For want of tracing the ideas we have, ii. 381, § 30.
Our ideas, almost all relative, Illation, what, iii. 114, § 2.
Particular are first in the mind, ii. 255, § 9. General are imperfect, ii. 255, $9. How positive ideas may be from privative causes, i. 118, § 4. The use of this term not dan- gerous, i. 7, &c. It is fitter than the word notion, i. 8. Other words as liable to be abused as this, i. 9. Yet it is condemned, both as new, and not new, i. 11. The same with notion, sense, meaning, &c. ii. 313. Identical propositions teach no- thing, iii. 43, § 2. Identity, not an innate idea, i. 58, 59, § 3, 4, 5. And diversity, ii. 47, §
Immensity, i. 158, § 4.
How this idea is got, i. 209, § 3. Immoralities, of whole nations, i. 40-42, § 9, 10. Immortality, not annexed to any shape, ii. 393, § 15. Impenetrability, i. 105, 106, § 1. Imposition of opinions unreason- able, iii. 103, § 4.
Impossibile est idem esse et non esse, not the first thing known, i. 30, § 25. Impossibility, not an innate idea, i. 58, § 3.
Impression on the mind, what, i. 15, § 5.
Inadequate ideas, ii. 112, § 1. Incompatibility, how far know- able, ii. 365, § 15. Individuationis principium, is existence, ii. 49, § 3.
« السابقةمتابعة » |