صور الصفحة
PDF
النشر الإلكتروني

gust 22. This alarmed the king of Navarre, | nation of them both. He boasted of being a and the prince of Conde, but the king and his chief adviser of the late massacre, and the Promother promising to punish the assassin, they testants abhorred him for it. The papists were quiet. The next Sunday, August 9, 24, hated him for his adherence to the Hugonot being St. Bartholomew's day, when the bells house of Bourbon, and for the edicts which he rang for morning prayers, the Duke of Guise, sometimes granted in favour of the Protestbrother of the last, appeared with a great num- ants, though his only aim was to weaken the ber of soldiers and citizens, and began to mur- Guises. The ladies held him in execration der the Hugonots; the wretched Charles ap- for his unnatural practices: and the duchess peared at the windows of his palace, and en- of Montpensier talked of clipping his hair, and deavoured to shoot those who fled, crying to of making him a monk. His heavy taxes, their pursuers, Kill them, kill them. The mas- which were consumed by his favourites, excitsacre continued seven days; seven hundred ed the populace against him, and, while his houses were pillaged; five thousand people kingdom was covering with carnage and drenchperished in Paris; neither age, nor sex, nor ing in blood, he was training lap dogs to tumeven women with child were spared; one ble, and parrots to prate. butcher boasted to the king that he had hewn down a hundred and fifty in one night. The rage ran from Paris to the provinces, where twenty-five thousand more were cruelly slain; the queen of Navarre was poisoned; and, during the massacre, the king offered the king of Navarre, and the young prince of Conde, son of the late prince, if they would not renounce Hugonotism, either death, mass, or bastile: for he said he would not have one left to reproach him. This bloody affair does not lie between Charles IX., his mother Catherine of Medicis, and the Duke of Guise; for the church of Rome, and the court of Spain, by exhibiting public rejoicings on the occasion, have adopted it for their own, or, at least, have claimed a share.

In this reign was formed the famous league, 1576, which reduced France to the most miserable condition that could be. The chief promoter of it was the duke of Guise. The pretence was the preservation of the Catholic re"The ligion. The chief articles were three. defence of the Catholic religion. The esta blishment of Henry III. on the throne. The maintaining of the liberty of the kingdom, and the assembling of the states." Those who entered into the league promised to obey such a general as should be chosen for the defence of it, and the whole was confirmed by oath. The weak Henry subscribed it at first in hopes of subduing the Hugonots; the queen mother, the Guises, the pope, the king of Spain, many of the clergy, and multitudes of the people became leaguers. When Henry perceived that Guise was aiming by this league to dethrone him, he favoured the Protestants, and they obtained an edict for the free exercise of their religion, 1576; but edicts were vain things against the power of the league, and three civil wars raged in this reign.

Would any one after this propose passive obedience and non-resistance to French Protestants? Or can we wonder, that, abhorring a church, who offered to embrace them with hands reeking with the blood of their brethren, they put on their armour again, and commenced a fourth civil war? The late massacre raised up also another party, called Politicians,, Guise's pretended zeal for the Romish reliwho proposed to banish the family of Guise gion allured the clergy, and France was filled from France, to remove the queen mother, and with seditious books and sermons. The preachthe Italians, from the government, and to re- ers of the league were the most furious of all store peace to the nation. This faction was sermon mongers. They preached up the exheaded by Montmorenci, who had an eye to cellency of the established church, the necesthe crown. During these troubles, the king sity of uniformity, the horror of Hugonotism, died, in the twenty-fifth year of his age, 1574. the merit of killing the tyrant on the throne, Charles had a lively little genius; he composed (for so they called the king) the genealogy of a book on hunting, and valued himself on his the house of Guise, and every thing else that skill in physiognomy. He thought courage could inflame the madness of party rage. It consisted in swearing and taunting at his cour- is not enough to say that these abandoned tiers. His diversions were hunting, music, clergymen disgraced their office; truth obliges women, and wine. His court was a common- us to add, they were protected, and preferred sewer of luxury and impiety, and, while his to dignities in the church, both in France and favourites were fleecing his people, he employ-Spain. ed himself in the making of rhymes. TheThe nearer the Guises approached to the part which he acted in the Bartholomean tra- crown the more were they inflamed at the gedy, the worst crime that was ever perpe- sight of it. They obliged the king to forbid trated in any Christian country, will mark his the exercise of the Protestant religion. They reign with infamy, to the end of time. endeavoured to exclude the king of Navarre, who was now the next heir to the throne, from the succession. They began to act so haughtily that Henry caused the Duke and the cardinal to be assassinated, 1588. The next year he himself was assassinated by a friar, 1589. Religion flourishes where nothing else can grow, and the reformation spread more and more in this reign. The exiles at Geneva filled France with a new translation of the Bible, with books, letters, catechisms, hymns, and preachers, and the people, contrasting the

Henry III.who succeeded his brother Charles, was first despised, and then hated, by all his subjects. He was so proud that he set rails round his table, and affected the pomp of an eastern king: and so mean that he often walked in procession with a beggarly brotherhood, with a string of beads in his hand, and a whip at his girdle. He was so credulous that he took the sacrament with the Duke of Guise, and with the cardinal of Lorrain, his brother; and so treacherous, that he caused the assassi

religion of Christ with the religion of Rome, entertained a most serious aversion for the latter. In the last king ended the family of Valois, and the next heir was Henry IV. of the house of Bourbon, king of Navarre. His majesty had been educated a Protestant, and had been the protector of the party, and the Protestants had reason to expect much from him on his ascending the throne of France: but he had many difficulties to surmount; for could the men who would not bear a Hugonot subject, bear a Hugonot king? Some of the old faction disputed his title, and all insisted on a christian king. Henry had for him, on the one side, almost all the nobility, the whole court of the late king, all Protestant states, and princes, and the old Hugonot troops: on the other, he had against him, the common people, most of the great cities, all the parliaiments except two, the greatest part of the clergy, the pope, the king of Spain, and most Catholic states. Four years his majesty deliberated, negotiated, and fought, but could not gain Paris. At length, the league set up a king of the house of Guise, and Henry found that the throne was inaccessible to all but papists; he therefore renounced heresy before Dr. Benoit, a moderate papist, and professed his conversion to popery. Paris opened its gates, the pope sent an absolution, and Henry became a most Christian king, 1594. Every man may rejoice that his virtue is not put to the trial of refusing a crown!

which they were all involved, so that he deservedly acquired from his enemies the epithet Great, though his friends durst not give him that of Good.

The king had been so well acquainted with the Protestants, that he perfectly knew their principles, and, could he have acted as he would, he would have instantly granted them all that they wanted. Their enemies had falsely said, that they were enemies to government: but the king knew better; and he also knew that the claims of his family would have been long ago buried in oblivion, had not the Protestants supported them. Marshal Biron had been one chief instrument of bringing him to the throne. The Marshal was not a good Hugonot, nor did he profess to be a pa pist: but he espoused the Protestant party," for he was a man of great sense, and he hated. violence in religion; and there were many more of the same cast. Parties, however, ran so high that precipitancy would have lost all, and Henry was obliged to proceed by slow and cautious steps.

The deputies of the reformed churches, soon waited on his majesty to congratulate him, and to pray for liberty. The king allowed them to hold a general assembly, and offered them some slight satisfaction: but the hardy veteran Hugonots, who had spent their days in the field, and who knew also that persons, who were of approved fidelity, might venture to give the king their advice without angering him, took the liberty of reminding him that they would not be paid in compliments for so many signal services. Their ancestors and they had supported his right to the crown, along with their own right to liberty of conscience, and as Providence had granted the one, they expected that the other would not be denied. The king felt the force of these remonstrances, and ventured to allow them to hold provincial assemblies; after a while, to convene a national synod, and, as soon as he could, he granted them the famous EDICT OF NANTZ, 1598.

When his majesty got to his palace in Paris, he thought proper to conciliate his new friends by showing them particular esteem, and played at cards the first evening with a lady of the house of Guise, the most violent leaguer in all the party. His old servants, who had shed rivers of blood to bring the house of Bourbon to the throne, thought themselves neglected. While the Protestants were slighted, and while those, who had followed the league, were disengaging themselves from it on advantageous conditions, one of the king's old friends said, "We do not envy your killing the fatted calf for the prodigal son, provided you do not sa-The Edict of Nantz, which was called per crifice the obedient son to make the better en-petual and irrevocable, and which contained tertainment for the prodigal. I dread those ninety-two articles, besides fifty-six secret arbargains, in which things are given up, and ticles, granted to the Protestants liberty of con nothing got but mere words; the words of those science, and the free exercise of religion; many who hitherto have had no words at all." churches in all parts of France, and judges of their own persuasion; a free access to all places of honour and dignity; great sums of money to pay off their troops; a hundred places as pledges of their future security, and certain funds to maintain both their preachers and their garrisons The king did not send this edict to be registered in parliament, till the pope's legate was gone out of the kingdom, so that it did not go there till the next year. Some of the old party in the house boggled at it very much, and particularly because the Hugonots were hereby qualified for offices, and places of trust; but his majesty sent for some of the chiefs to his closet, made them a most pathetic speech on the occasion, and, with some difficulty, brought them to a compliance. It is easy to conceive that the king might be very pathetic on this occasion, for he had seen and suffered enough to make any man so. The meanest Hugonot soldier could not avoid the

By ascending the throne of France, Henry had risen to the highest degree of wretchedness. He had offered violence to his conscience by embracing popery; he had stirred up a general discontent among the French Protestants; the queen of England, and the Protestant states, reproached him bitterly; the league refused to acknowledge him till the pope had absolved him in form; the king of Spain caballed for the crown; several cities held out against him; many of the clergy thought him a hypocrite, and refused to insert his name in the public prayers of the church; the lawyers published libels against him; the Jesuits threatened to assassinate him, and actually attempted to do it. In this delicate and difficult situation, though his majesty manifested the frailty of humanity by renounc ing Protestantism, yet he extricated himself and his subjects from the fatal labyrinths in

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

2

[ocr errors]

3

pathos, if he related his campaigns. But it is very credible, that it was not the pathos of his majesty's language, but the power in his hand, that affected these intolerant souls.

No nation ever made a more noble struggle for recovering liberty of conscience out of the rapacious hands of the Papal priesthood than the French. And one may venture to defy the most sanguine friend to intolerance to prove, that a free toleration hath, in any country, at any period, produced such calamities in society as those which persecution produced in France. After a million of brave men had been destroyed, after nine civil wars, after four pitched battles, after the besieging of several hundred places, after more than three hundred engagements, after poisoning, burning, assassinating, massacreing, murdering in every form, France is forced to submit to what her wise Chancellor de L'Hospital had at first proposed, A FREE TOLERATION. Most of the zealous leaguers voted for it, because they had found by experience, they said, that violent proceedings in matters of religion prove more destructive than edifying A noble testimony from enemies'

mouths!

France now began to taste the sweets of peace; the king employed himself in making his subjects happy, and the far greater part of his subjects, endeavoured to render him so. The Protestants applied themselves to the care of their churches, and, as they had at this time a great many able ministers, they flourished, and increased the remaining part of this reign. The doctrine of their churches was Calvinism, and their discipline was Presbyterian, after the Geneva plan. Their churches were supplied by able pastors; their universities were adorned 優 with learned and pious professors, such as Casaubon, Daille, and others, whose praises are in all the reformed churches; their provincial and national synods were regularly convened, and their people were well governed. Much pains were taken with the king to alienate his mind from his Protestant subjects: but no motives could influence him. He knew the worth of the men, and he protected them till his death. This great prince was hated by the Popish clergy for his lenity, and was stabbed in his coach by the execrable Ravillac, whose name inspires one with horror and pain, May 14, 1610.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Lewis XIII. was not quite nine years of age, when he succeeded his father Henry. The first act of the queen mother, who had the regency during the king's minority, was the confirmation of the edict of Nantz. Lewis confirmed it again at his majority, promising to observe it inviolably, 1614. The Protestants deserved a confirmation of their privileges at hus hands; for they had taken no part in the civil wars and disturbances which had troubled his minority. They had been earnestly solicited to intermeddle with government: but they had wisely avoided it.

Lewis was a weak, ambitious man; he was jealous of his power to excess, though he did know wherein it consisted. He was so void of prudence, that he could not help exalting his flatterers into favourites, and his favourites into excessive power. He was so timorous that his favourites became the objects of

his hatred, the moment after he had elevated them to authority: and he was so callous that he never lamented a favourite's death or downfall. By a solemn act of devotion, attended with all the force of pictures, masses, processions, and festivals, he consecrated his person, his dominions, his crown and his subjects to the Virgin Mary, desiring her to defend his kingdom, and to inspire him with grace to lead a holy life, 1638. The Popish clergy adored him for thus sanctifying their superstitions by his example, and he, in return, lent them his power to punish his Protestant subjects, whom he hated. His panegyrists call him Lewis the Just: but they ought to acknowledge that his majesty did nothing to merit the title, till he found himself dying.

Lewis's prime minister was an artful, enterprising clergyman, who, before his elevation, was a country bishop, and, after it, was known by the title of Cardinal de Richlieu: but the most proper title for his eminence is that, which some historians give him, of the Jupiter Mactator of France. He was a man of great ability: but of no merit. Had his virtue been as great as his capacity, he ought not to have been intrusted with government, because all Cardinals take an oath to the Pope, and although an oath does not bind a bad man, yet as the taking of it gives him credit, so the breach of it ruins all his prospects among those with whom he hath taken it.

The Jesuits, who had been banished from France, for attempting the life of Henry IV. 1594, had been recalled, and restored to their houses, 1604, and one of their society, under pretence of being responsible, as a hostage, for the whole fraternity, was allowed to attend the king. The Jesuits, by this means, gained the greatest honour and power; and, as they excelled in learning, address, and intrigue, they knew how to obtain the king's ear, and how to improve his credulity to their own advantage.

This dangerous society was first formed, 1534, by Ignatius Loyola, a Spanish deserter, who, being frightened out of the army by a wound, took it into his head to go on a pilgrimage, and to form a religious society for the support of the Catholic faith. The Popes, who knew how to avail themselves of enthusiasm in church government, directed this grand spring of human action to secular purposes, and, by canonizing the founder, and arranging the order, elevated the society in a few years, to a height that astonished all Europe. It was one opinion of this society, that the authority of kings is inferior to that of the people, and that they may be punished by the people in certain cases. It was another maxim with them, that sovereign princes have received from the hand of God a sword to punish heretics. The Jesuits did not invent these doctrines; but they drew such consequences from them as were most prejudicial to the public tranquillity; for, from the conjunction of these two principles, they concluded that an heretical prince ought to be deposed, and that heresy ought to be extirpated by fire and sword, in case it could not be extirpated otherwise. In conformity to the first of these principles, two kings of France had been murdered successively, under pretext that they were fautors of heretics. The par

1

liament in this reign, 1615, condemned this as a pernicious tenet, and declared that the authority of monarchs was dependant only on God. But the last principle, that related to the extirpation of heresy, as it flattered the court and the clergy, came into vogue. Jus divinum was the test of sound orthodoxy; and this reasoning became popular argumentation, Princes MAY put heretics to death; therefore they OUGHT to put them to death.

Richlieu, who had wriggled himself into power, by publishing a scandalous libel on the Protestants of France, advised the king to establish his authority, by extirpating the intestine evils of the kingdom. He assured his majesty that the Hugonots had the power of doing him mischief, and that it was a principle with them, that kings might be deposed by the people. The Protestants replied to his invectives, and exposed the absurdity of his reasoning. Richlieu reasoned thus. John Knox, the Scotch reformer, did not believe the divine authority of kings. Calvin held a correspondence with Knox, therefore Calvin did not believe it. The French reformed church derived its doctrine from Calvin's church of Geneva, therefore the first Hugonots did not believe it. The first Hugonots did not believe it, therefore the present Hugonots do not believe it. No man, who valued the reputation of a man of sense, would have scaled the walls of preferment with such a ridiculous ladder as this!

The king, intoxicated with despotic principles, followed the fatal advice of his minister, and began with his patrimonial province of Bearn, where he caused the Catholic religion to be established, 1620. The Hugonots broke out into violence, at this attack on their liberties, whence the king took an opportunity to recover several places from them, and at last made peace with them on condition of their demolishing all their fortifications except those of Montauban and Rochelle. Arnoux, the Jesuit, who was a creature of Richlieu's, was at that time, confessor of Lewis the Just.

day. At length Richlieu determined to put a period to their hopes, by the taking of Rochelle. The city was besieged both by sea and land, and the efforts of the besieged were at last overcome by famine; they had lived without bread for thirteen weeks, and, of eighteen thousand citizens there were not above five thousand left, 1625. The strength of the Protestants was broken by this stroke. Montauban agreed now to demolish its works, and the just king confirmed anew the perpetual and irrevocable edict of Nantz, as far as it concerned a free exercise of religion.

The Cardinal, not content with temporal power, had still another claim on the Protestants, of a spiritual kind. Cautionary towns must be given up to that, and conscience to this. He suffered the edict to be infringed every day, and he was determined not to stop till he had established a uniformity in the church, without the obtaining of which, he thought, that something was wanting to his master's power. The Protestants did all that prudence could suggest. They sent the famous Amyraut to court to complain to the king of the infraction of their edicts, 1631. Mr. Amyraut was a proper person to go on this business. He had an extreme attachment to the doctrine of passive obedience. This rendered him agreeable to the court: and he had declared for no obedience in matters of conscience, and this made him dear to the Protestants. The synod ordered him not to make his speech to the king kneeling, as the deputies of the former synod had done: but to procure the restoring of the privilege, which they formerly enjoyed, of speaking to the king, standing, as the other ecclesiastics of the kingdom were allowed to do. The cardinal strove, for a whole fortnight, to make Amyraut submit to this tacit acknowledgment of the clerical character in the Popish clergy, and of the want of it in the reformed ministers. But Amyraut persisted in his claim, and was introduced to the king as the synod had The politic Richlieu invariably pursued his desired. The whole court was charmed with design of rendering his master absolute. By the deputy's talents and deportment. Richlieu one art he subdued the nobility, by another the had many conferences with him, and, if negoparliaments, and, as civil and religious liberty tiation could have accommodated the dispute live and die together, he had engines of all between arbitrary power and upright consorts to extirpate heresy. He pretended to sciences, it would have been settled now. He have formed the design of re-uniting the two was treated with the utmost politeness, and churches of Protestants and Catholics. He dismissed. If he had not the pleasure of redrew off from the Protestant party the dukes flecting that he had obtained the liberty of his of Sully, Bouillon, Lesdeguieres, Rohan, and party, he had, however, the peace that ariseth many of the first quality: for he had the world, from the consciousness of having used a proand its glory to go to market withal; and he per mean to obtain it. The same mean was had to do with a race of men, who were very tried, some time after, by the inimitable Du different from their ancestors. Most of them Bosc, whom his countrymen call a PERFECT had either died for their profession, or fled out ORATOR, but alas! he was eloquent in vain. of the kingdom, and several of them had sub-The affairs of the Protestants waxed every mitted to practise mean trades, in foreign countries, for their support: but these were endeavouring to serve God and mammon; and his eminence was a fit casuist for such consciences. The Protestants had resolved, in a general assembly, to die rather than to submit to the loss of their liberties: but their king was weak, their prime minister was wicked, their clerical enemies were powerful and implacable, and they were obliged to bear those infractions of edicts, which their oppressors made every

day worse and worse. They saw the clouds gathering, and they dreaded the weight of the storm: but they knew not whither to flee. Some fled to England, but no peace was there. Laud, the tyrant of the English church, had a Richlieu's heart without his head; he persecuted them, and, in conjunction with Wren,.. and other such churchmen, drove them back, to the infinite damage of the manufactures of the kingdom, 1634. It must effect every liberal eye to see such professors as Amyraut

3

Cappel, and De La Place; such ministers as Mestrezat and Blondel, who would have been an honour to any community, driven to the sad alternative of flying their country, or of violating their consciences. But their time was not yet fully come.

scholars, masters of the controversy, hearty in the service, and the mortifications, to which they had been long accustomed, had taught them that temperate coolness, which is so essential in the investigating and supporting of truth. They published, therefore, unanswerable arguments for their non-conformity. The famous Mr. Claude, pastor of the church at Charenton, near Paris, wrote a defence of the

could not answer. The bishops, however, answered the Protestants all at once, by procuring an edict which forbade them to print

Cardinal Richlieu's hoary head went down to the grave, 1642, without the tears of his master, and with the hatred of all France. The king soon followed him, 1643, complain-reformation, which all the clergy in France ing, in the words of Job, my soul is weary of my life. The Protestants had increased greatly in numbers in this reign, though they had lost their power: for they were now computed to exceed two millions. So true is it, that violent measures in religion weaken the church that employs them.

Lewis XIV. was only in the fifth year of his age at the demise of his father. The queenmother was appointed sole regent during his minority, and Cardinal Mazarine, a creature of Richlieu's, was her prime minister, 1643. The edict of Nantz was confirmed by the regent, and again by the king at his majority, 1652. But it was always the cool determination of the minister to follow the late Cardinal's plan, and to revoke it as soon as he could, and he strongly impressed the mind of the king with the expediency of it.

Lewis, who was a perfect tool to the Jesuits, followed the advice of Mazarine, of his confessors, and of the clergy about him, and as soon as he took the management of affairs into his, own hands, he made a firm resolution to destroy the Protestants, 1661. He tried to weaken them by buying off their great men, and he had but too much success. Some, indeed, were superior to this state trick; and it was a noble answer which the Marquis de Bougy gave, when he was offered a marshal's staff, and any government that he might make hoice of, provided he would turn Papist. Could I be prevailed on," said he, "to betray my God, for a marshal of France's staff, I might betray my king for a thing of much less consequence: but I will do neither of them, but rejoice to find that my services are acceptable, and that the religion which I profess, is the only obstacle to my reward." Was his majesty so little versed in the knowledge of mankind, as not to know that saleable virtue is seldom worth buying?

The king used another art as mean as the former. He exhorted the bishops to take care, that the points in controversy betwixt the Catholics and Calvinists should be much insisted on by the clergy, in their sermons, especially in those places that were mostly inhabited by the latter, and that a good number of missionaries should be sent among them, to convert them to the religion of their ancestors. It should seem, at first view, that the exercise of his majesty's power in this way would be formidable to the Protestants, for, as the king had the nomination of eighteen archbishops, a hundred and nine bishops, and seven hundred and fifty abbots, and as these dignitaries governed the inferior clergy, it is easy to see that all the popish clergy of France were creatures of the court, and several of them were men of good learning. But the Protestants had no fears on this head. They were excellent

The king, in prosecution of his design, excluded the Calvinists from his household, and from all other employments of honour and profit; he ordered all the courts of justice, erected by virtue of the edict of Nantz, to be abolished, and, in lieu of them, made several laws in favour of the Catholic religion, which debarred from all liberty of abjuring the Catholic doctrine, and restrained those Protestants, who had embraced it, from returning to their former opinions, under severe punishments. He ordered soldiers to be quartered in their houses till they changed their religion. He shut up their churches, and forbade the ministerial function to their clergy, and, where his commands were not readily obeyed, he levelled their churches with the ground. At last he revoked the edict of Nantz, and banished them from the kingdom, October 22, 1685.

[ocr errors]

"A thousand dreadful blows," says Mr. Saurin, were struck at our afflicted churches, before that which destroyed them: for our enemies, if I may use such an expression, not content with seeing our ruin, endeavoured to taste it. One while, edicts were published against those, who, foreseeing the calamities that threatened our churches, and not having power to prevent them, desired only the sad consolation of not being spectators of their ruin, August, 1669. Another while, against those, who, through their weakness, had denied their religion, and who not being able to bear the remorse of their consciences, desired to return to their first profession, May, 1679. One while, our pastors were forbidden to exercisetheir discipline on those of their flocks, who had abjured the truth, June, 1680. Another while, children of seven years of age were allowed to embrace doctrines, which, the churchof Rome says, are not level to the capacitiesof adults, June, 1681. Now a college was suppressed, and then a church shut up, January, 1683. Sometimes we were forbidden to~ convert infidels; and sometimes to confirm those in the truth, whom we had instructed from their infancy, and our pastors were for bidden to exercise their pastoral office any longer in one place than three years, July, 1685. Sometimes the printing of our books was pro hibited, and sometimes those which we had printed were taken away, September, 1685. One while, we were not suffered to preach in a church, and another while, we were punished for preaching on its ruins, and at length we were forbidden to worship God in public at all,” October, 1685. Now we were banished, then we were forbidden to quit the kingdom on pain of death, 1689. Here we saw the glorious rewards of those who betrayed their religion;.

[ocr errors]
« السابقةمتابعة »