لمحة عن هذا الكتاب
مكتبتي
الكتب على Google Play
CONTENTS.
MORAL GOVERNMENT.
LECTURE I.
Definition of the the term Law,
Distinction between Physical and Moral Law, -
The essential Attributes of Moral Law,
Liberty as opposed to Necessity,
Adaptability, or Adaptation,
Universality,
MORAL GOVERNMENT, CONTINued.
Shown by an appeal to reason, or to natural theology, to
what acts and states of mind moral obligation cannot
directly extend,
Shown to what acts and states of mind Moral Obliga-
tion must directly extend,
To what acts and mental states Moral Obligation indi-
rectly extends,
35
36
38
LECTURE IV.
FOUNDATION OF MORAL OBLIGATION.
Definition of Moral Obligation repeated,
40
Attention called again to the conditions of Moral Obliga-
tion,
What is intended by the foundation of moral obligation, 41
The extent of moral obligation,
41
Points of agreement among the principal parties in this
discussion,
Wherein parties differ, -
42
Shown from reason and revelation what must be the foun-
dation of moral obligation,
Shown wherein that consists which constitutes the true
foundation of moral obligation; in other words, in
what the highest well-being or ultimate good of senti-
ent beings consists,
44
The ultimate and absolute good must belong to being, or
to sentient existences,
With moral agents at least the ultimate good must con-
sist in a state of mind,
45
The ultimate and absolute good in the sense of the in-
trinsically valuable, can not be identical with Moral
Law, 45
Obedience, or the course of acting or willing required by
the law, cannot be the ultimate end aimed at by the
law or the lawgiver,
The absolute and ultimate good of being can not consist
in moral worth or good desert,
47
Right Character, moral worth, good desert, meritorious-
Page
ness, or whatever you call it, can not be or consist in a
state of mind,
49
58
The ultimate or absolute good can not consist in any
thing external to mind itself,
Objections to this philosophy considered,
LECTURE V.
FOUNDATION Of moral obligATION,-FALSE THEORIES.
That the sovereign will of God is the foundation of mor-
al Obligation,
The theory of Paley,
The utilitarian philosophy,
-
LECTURE VI.
FOUNDATION OF MORAL OBLIGATION, FALSE THEORIES.
The theory that regards right as the foundation of moral
obligation,
LECTURE VII.
The theory that the goodness or moral excellence of God
is the foundation of moral obligation,
LECTURE VIII.
The Philosophy which teaches that moral order is the
foundation of moral obligation,
The theory that maintains that the nature and relations
of moral beings is the true foundation of moral obli-
gation,
The theory that teaches that moral obligation is found-
ed in the idea of duty, -
111
That philosophy which teaches the complexity of the
foundation of moral obligation, -
115
Another form of the theory that affirms the complexity
of the foundation of moral obligation; complex, how-
ever, only in a certain sense,
118
LECTURE IX.
FOUNDATION OF MORAL OBLIGATION.-PRACTICAL BEARINGS
OF THE DIFFERENT THEORIES.
The theory that regards the sovereign will of God as
the foundation of moral obligation,
The theory of the selfish school,
The natural and necessary results of utilitarianism,
LECTURE X.
127
132
135
FOUNDATION Of moral obligATION.-PRACTICAL BEARINGS
OF THE DIFFERENT THEORIES,—Continued.
Practical bearings and tendency of Rightarianism,
The philosophy which teaches that the divine goodness
or moral excellence is the foundation of moral obli-
139
143
The practical bearings of the theory that moral obliga-
tion is founded in the nature and relations of moral
agents,
The theory which teaches that moral order is the foun-
144
145
146
The theory which teaches that the idea of duty is the
The complexity of the foundation of moral obligation, 146
The practical bearings of what is regarded as the true
theory of the foundation of moral obligation, namely
that the highest well-being of God and of the uni-
verse is the sole foundation of moral obligation,
LECTURE XI.
MORAL GOVERNMENT,-CONTINUED.
What constitutes obedience to moral law,
Obedience cannot be partial in the sense that the sub-
ject ever does or can partly obey and partly disobey
at the same time,
150
Can the will at the same time make opposite choices? 150
The choice of an ultimate end is, and must be, the su-
preme preference of the mind,
An intelligent choice must respect ends or means,
No choice whatever can be made inconsistent with the
present choice of an ultimate end,
Inquiry respecting the strength or intensity of the
choice,
151
152
- 155
The law does not require the constant and most intense
action of the will,
An intention cannot be right and honest in kind and
deficient in the degree of intensity,
Examination of the philosophy of the question whether
sin and holiness consist in supreme ultimate and op-
posite choices or intentions,
155
158
167
Objections to the foregoing philosophy considered,
This philosophy examined in the light of the Scriptures, 171
LECTURE XII.
MORAL GOVERNMENT-CONTINUED.
In what sense we have seen that obedience to moral
law cannot be partial,
174
In what sense obedience to moral law can be partial, 175
The government of God accepts nothing as virtue but
obedience to the law of God,
175
There can be no rule of duty but moral law,
176
Nothing can be virtue or true religion but obedience to
the moral law,
177
Nothing can be virtue that is not just what the moral law
demands. That is, nothing short of what it requires
can be in any sense virtue,
Uses of the term Justification, -
Fundamentally important inquiries respecting this sub-
178
· 178
Just rules of legal interpretation,
- 188
- 189
That actual knowledge is indispensable to moral obliga-
tion shown from scripture,
In the light of the above rules inquire what is not implied
in entire obedience to the law of God, -
191
- 192