Terrorism in the United States: The Nature and Extent of the Threat and Possible Legislative Responses : Hearings Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on ... Penalties ... Crime of Conspiracy ... Deport Suspected Terrorists ... Counterterrorism Intelligence ... Increased Wiretap and Infiltration for Federal Law Enforcement, April 27 and May 24, 1995, المجلد 4

الغلاف الأمامي
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997 - 259 من الصفحات
 

طبعات أخرى - عرض جميع المقتطفات

عبارات ومصطلحات مألوفة

مقاطع مشهورة

الصفحة 237 - wrote: [W]e should be eternally vigilant against attempts to check the expression of opinions that we loathe and believe to be fraught with death, unless they so immediately threaten immediate interference with the lawful and pressing purposes of the law that an immediate check is required to save the country.
الصفحة 248 - That a well regulated Militia, composed of the Body of the People, trained to Arms, is the proper, natural, and safe Defense of a free State; that standing Armies, in Time of Peace, should be avoided, as dangerous to Liberty; and that, in all Cases, the Military should be under strict Subordination to, and governed by, the civil Power.
الصفحة 237 - government may not: forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action. 105
الصفحة 244 - provides: Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined no more than
الصفحة 217 - consistently held: the due process clause "is a restraint on the legislative as well as the executive and judicial powers of the government and cannot be so construed as to leave Congress free to make any process 'due process of law,' by its mere will.
الصفحة 237 - T'he most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a crowded theater and causing a panic.
الصفحة 217 - cases and controversies; and thus, "though individual oppression may now and then proceed from the courts of justice, the general liberty of the people can never be endangered from that quarter: . . . so long as the judiciary remains truly distinct from both the legislative and executive.
الصفحة 237 - [N]o danger flowing from speech can be deemed clear and present, unless the incidence of the evil apprehended is so imminent that it may befall before there is an opportunity for full discussion.
الصفحة 159 - low: a domestic security/terrorism investigation may be opened whenever "facts or circumstances reasonably indicate that two or more persons are engaged in an enterprise for the purpose of furthering political or social goals wholly or in part through activities that involve force or violence and a violation of the criminal laws of the United
الصفحة 165 - activities that involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State and which appear to be intended to

معلومات المراجع