In a word, we may not only, in reference to the matter in hand, take notice of what Lucian relates concerning the religion of the Affyrians (s), which did fo lively preferve the memory of the deluge, and of what was done to Noah by his fon Cham, when he fcoffed at the nakedness of his father (t); but alfo, that the God of the Sichemites was called Baalberith, whofe fymbol was the figure of the privy parts of a man, which feems a manifeft allufion to their defcent from the family of Cham, the Sichemites being fome of the pofterity of Canaan.

It is alfo very natural to conceive, first of all, that it was from those old pretenfions that the Canaanites took occafion to profane the most holy things with fuch fhameful ideas.

Secondly, That it was in deteftation of these ideas, that God ordered the killing of the pricfts of Baal.

And,

Thirdly, That it was for the fame reafon, that the Jews were commanded to destroy them utterly.

Fourthly, This was also the reason why the Ifraelites were so often defirous of imitating their crimes.

In the fifth place, as we fee that upon the like account the Moabites and Ammonites took Chemofb for their god, and that the women of those nations were very zealous to propagate their religion, of which we have an inftance in Jezabel, the wife of Ahab, fo God was alfo willing to infpire his people with horror and deteftation for their religion or any alliance with them.

Laftly, as there does appear a very great conformity and resemblance between the firft birth of the world from the firft chaos, and its being i born again after the deluge; between Adam the first man, and Noah the fecond; and between the jealoufies fprung up in both their families upon the account of the promife of the Meffiah; fo this conformity could not but very naturally contribute to preferve the memory of thofe ancient events which Noah and his children had delivered to their pofterity with all the care which is taken to preserve the tradition of the fundamentals of religion.

CHA P. XV.

That we find the Family of AERAHAM, and his Pofterity till JACOB, fully perfuaded of thofe Truths.

Iruths was in procefs of time handed down to Jacob and his pof

T is no lefs eafy to conceive how the diftinct knowledge of thefe

terity. This I fhall briefly explain.

I need

(3) Judg. viii. 23. & ix. S. Talm. Hier. fol. 11. col. 4. & gloff, in b. l. & Avodazara, c. iii. fol. 43. col. 1.

(1) De Dea Syr. p. 1069.

I need not take notice here, that the religion practifed by Abraham and his pofterity, fuppofe thofe matters as conftantly owned and known. It cannot be denied, but that Lot, having followed Terah and Abraham when God called the latter out of Chaldea, might thence fuppofe, that this heavenly call did feparate and diftinguish him from the reft of the pofterity of Shem, and gave him a right, as well as Abraham, to pretend to the privilege of fulfilling the promise of the Meffiah, or at least to see it fulfilled in his pofterity. This we may infer from the inceft of Lot's daughters their crime, which in another view appears very monftrous, doth clearly prove, that they were ftrongly poffeffed with this hope, which their father had raised in them.

I know that fome interpreters fuppofe (x), that they were moved to commit this inceft from a pious intention of preferving mankind, as imagining to themfelves, that as the deluge had drowned all men, befides. Noah and his family, fo the flames which deftroyed Sodom had confumed all mankind; which they were the more ready to believe, because they might have heard from their father, that the world one day was to perish by fire. But indeed it may be confidered as proceeding from a very different motive, the Jewish doctors (x) plainly averring, that this was done by them in hopes of bringing forth the promised Redeemer.

And if we look upon this action of theirs in this view, with reference to the promife of the Meffiah, which was the grand object of the hopes of all thofe that feared God; it is natural to conceive, that confidering their father as one whom God had peculiarly chofen from among the pofterity of Shem, to execute the promife of the Meffiah, and feeing that their mother was changed into a ftatue of falt, they conceived themfelves in fome fort authorised to furprife their father in that manner; and the rather, because they conceived on the one hand, that none of the Canaanites (upon whom God had now begun to pour forth fo hideous & vengeance, as a beginning of the execution of the curfe against Cham) having any part in this chiefeft of bleffings, could ever marry them, after that God had fo manifeftly separated and called forth their father from amongst them; and on the other hand, fuppofing that God would difpenfe with the irregularity of this action, by reaion of their being reduced to an extremity.

There be three circumftances which greatly confirm this my remark upon the motive of their inceft.

The first is, That they are reprefented to us as thofe who had behaved themselves very chaftely, in the midft of the impurities of Sodom; and that befides we find they defigned no fuch thing, till after the death of their mother.

The other is, That we fee them contriving the thing together, and that in a matter which naturally is apt to feparate the greatest friends, where the motive proceeds from a fpirit of uncleannefs; nor indeed do we find that they continued in this inceft.

The third is, That they were fo far from being afhamed of an action in itself fo criminal, or concealing the knowledge of it from pofterity, that they gave thofe names to the children born of this their inceft, that might

(x) Lyra in Genef. xix.

(x) Beref. Rab. part 23.

might perpetuate and divulge the memory of this their action, the one calling her fon Moab, as much as to fay, born of my father, and the other her's Benammi, a name of a like fignification with the former.

This obfervation is very neceffary, because these two fons became the heads of two great people, the Moabites and the Ammonites, whose kingdoms lafted above 1300 years, and lived on the borders of the holy land, and were jealous of Abraham and his pofterity, as pretending that Abrabam could not be chofen before Lot their father, who, being the fon of Abraham's eldeft brother, was to be confidered as the firft-born of Terah; and who were apt, without doubt, to take it for granted, that if God had brought Abraham out of Chaldea, and refcued him from Ur, he had in a more peculiar manner faved Lot alone from the conflagration of Sodom, by the miniftry of angels; and that Abraham and Lot being equally defcended from Terah, the right of accomplishing the promife did equally belong to them.

And indeed we find that in all fucceeding times thefe thoughts did predominate with them, as may eafily be made out from the hiftory of Balaam.

We fee therefore, that the Moabites, who were defcended from the eldest daughter of Lot, looked upon the pretenfions of the Ifraelites, that the Meffiah was to be born of their feed, in exclusion to all others, with great impatience; and it was for this reafon that they sent for Balaam, to decide (by Divine authority) the difference between them, concerning the right or the promised bleffing.

We may make very near the fame reflexions upon the calling of Ruth the Moabitefs, when the faith to Naomi her mother-in-law, Thy God shall be my God, and thy people shall be my people; which fignifies a renouncing of the pretenfions of her own people, and an acquiefcing in the justice of thofe of the Ifraelites; and it was upon this occafion, that Ruth is more particularly taken notice of in the genealogy of our Saviour, as I fhall have occafion to fhew hereafter.

That which I have hinted concerning the intention and aim of the daughters of Lot, hath been obferved before by the Jewish Rabbins, as we may fee in the most ancient of their Commentaries upon thefe words of Genefis, chap. xix. v. 32. Come, let us make our father drink wine, &c. Upon which words, R. Tanchumah, following the footsteps of R. Samuel, makes this reflexion: That we may preferve feed of our father; it is not faid, that we may preferve a fon from our father, but that we may renew the pofterity of our father, because (faith he) they had regard to that feed which was to proceed from a ftrange place; and what feed is that? It is the King Meffiah.

After this obfervation upon this action of Lor's daughters, it can no longer rationally be doubted, but that the violent paffion which Sarah had for a son, proceeded from the very fame impreffion which made her, contrary to the inclinations of that fex, to deliver her fervant into her husband's, bofom, efpecially if we join to this the particular promife God had made to Abraham, which fhe could not be ignorant

of.

Sarab fees herself deftitute of children; and her barrennefs having continued fo long a time, fhe had no hopes of ever being a mother: what

3

remained

remained therefore for her, but to think of adopting a fon of her bondwoman! And in confideration of this, the perfuades her husband, who had no inclination to any fuch thing by any thing that appears (at least precedent to this defire of his wife), to take her unto him. He fought the feed of God, that is, the feed which God had promifed, as Malachi expreffes it, Mal. ii. 15.

At least it is certain, that the Jews have taken these words of Malachi (x) in this fenfe for a very long time, as they do ftill to this

day.

We may eafily perceive, that this was a predominant impreffion throughout that whole family, if, to what we have already obferved of Let's daughters and of Sarah, we do but add the forrow Rebecca conceived because of her barrennefs, and the contentions happening between the wives of Jacob for their hufband's company; without which fuppofal, the relation of fuch a matter would be a thing of no import

ance.

Certainly, as it would be ridiculous to fuppofe that so wife an hiftorian as Mofes was, fhould ftoop to the recital of fuch mean and low particulars (not to fpeak worfe of them) without aiming at fomething very high and confiderable, fo it is rational to believe that in all these relations he pointed at the promife of the Meffiah, which at that time was the great object of the religion of the faithful, which God in process of time did explain by little and little more diftinctly.

The jealoufy alfo which arofe between Ishmael and Ifaac, is no less confiderable. Ishmael was the eldeft fon of Abraham, and circumcifed as well as Ifaac; he was faved from death by the miniftry of an angel; and was the head of a great people, who from that time to this very day have always been circumcifed.

It may be alfo of great ufe to take notice here, that Ifmael could not but be inftructed by Abraham concerning the promise God had made to him, to which he pretended, as being the elder, and therefore mocked at the great ftir was made at the weaning of Ifaac, as thinking that he, being the eldeft, could not be deprived of the natural right of his primogeniture. At leaft, it is very probable, that except it had been thus, Sarah's anger (approved by God himfelf) would not have proved fo vio lent, as well against Ishmael as Hagar, who flattered him in these preten. fions, nor would Abraham fo far have complied with it.

And forafmuch as Ifaac, on the other fide, was born to fulfil a particular promife, was circumcifed, and faved from death by an angel; and that, befides all this, Ifmael and he had been equally educated in the prac tice of religion; it is impoffible but that this conformity of events (which has been the cause of fuch lafting contests between them and their pof. terity) must have engaged them to inquire into the truth of the creation, and the promise of the Meffiah, and into all other matters which did any way concern them.

We have a like instance, if not stronger for our purpose, in Efau and Jacob, who were both born of the fame mother; but Efau being the firft-born, we find the fame jealousy arifing between them, as before (x) Targ. Jonath, in h. 1. & Kimchi in h. 1. R

VOL. I.

between

between Ishmael and Ifaac. Sarah feemed fomewhat cruel in cafting out her adopted fon Ifhmael; and here we fee that Rebecca preferred Jacob before Efau her firft-born, and affifted him in robbing his elder brother of the bleffing due to him of right: but without queftion, her defign in all this was to entail this bleffing on her family, by making it fall on Jacob, as being afraid (and that not without caufe) that Eau, by his fins and his marriage with the Canaanites, had made himself incapable thereof.

Now as this was the occafion of a great difpute between these two Patriarchs educated in the fame belief and religion, fo it plainly fhews us how ftrong a perfuafion they had of the creation, and the promise of the Meffiah.

And befides, it is further very remarkable,

Firft, That Mofes reprefents Efau as a profane perfon; for which, not only this reafon may be alledged, that he fold his birth-right for a mess of pottage, to which birth-right the priesthood was always annexed; but we must further take notice,

That he being educated by his father in the hopes of this bleffing, he feemed to laugh at it in all his actions; for firft he married the daughter of Heth, by which he fufficiently intimated that he neither minded the bleffing nor the curfe of God; for Canaan and his pofterity had in a very folemn manner been curfed by Noah, with a particular regard to the promife of the Meffiah, as 1 hinted before.

In the fecond place, he married a daughter of Ishmael, as if he intended to renew the pretenfions of Ishmael against Ifaac his father.

In the third place we fee, that when he repented of this profane humour, he was pierced with extreme forrow. for the crime he had committed, because he could not obtain pardon for it.

This jealoufy and difference between Efau and Jacob, is the more confiderable, becaufe Efau was the head of a great nation, viz. the Edomites, a people circumcifed as well as the Jews, jealous of the pofterity of Jacob, and living upon the borders of Judea, as well as the Meabites, Ammonites, and Ishmaelites, but yet put by their hopes by that oracle, The greater people fhall ferve the leffer.

Were it needful to afford a greater light to thefe reflexions, I might here add a very natural one, from the oath which Abraham made his fervant Eliezer take, when he fent him to Padan-Aram, to procure a wife for Ifaac. We may eafily judge that he was not willing he fhould marry a Canaanite, as Lot had done; and that, for fear of forfeiting his hopes, and weakening the just pretentions of Ifaac to the right of accomplishing the promife, from whence the Canaanites were excluded by the prophecy delivered by Noah. But that which made Abraham to oblige his fervant to fwear, putting his hand under his thigh; that is, touching that part which was the fubject of circumcifion (y), and which bore the mark of the covenant; deferves a further confideration.

We find first of all, that the Patriarch Jacob obferves the fame cuftom, when he made his fon Jofeph to take an oath, that he fhould not bury him in Egypt.

Secondly, We find that this cuftom of beholding that member which

received

(y) St. Jerom.